Well, I think they're "phantom" guidelines. Maybe new ones are out there but I haven't seen anything. Anyone know of this?

Those tests aren't "needed" to know but most MG experts "require" them to be done. If someone exhibits all the clinical signs of MG and other diseases have been ruled out, plus there is some kind of positive test, it "might" be enough for a diagnosis. Yeah, I'm being a bit sarcastic because there really is not a consistent agreement among neurologists as to what constitutes an MG diagnosis.

Did you get an MG diagnosis?

Annie