View Single Post
Old 10-03-2011, 04:42 PM
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Default true, but...

I think there is more to it than that...if he were to go back to animal models, it would set us back light years in the eyes of the FDA people. Plus, I am fairly sure he had patients scanned by MRI and out of 20 pwp, 78% had the compression.

The Doctor, I think, is trying to say and prove he has a major discovery on his hands. Again, unfortunately, I think this surgery will only work with some of us The good side is that highlights that this will embarrass the American Academy of Neurology to acknowledge that is ethically questionable to continue without testing for us anything; we're gaining too much knowledge and eventually they will need to change their ways.

So by going right to even more random pwp and testing "in the wild" and placebo he is way ahead of the pack. Or so it seems to me....


Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote