View Single Post
Old 10-16-2011, 01:26 AM
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gday View Post
Not true. Anyone can be trained and still have a disability. He is actually good & terrible with money. It is a true contradiction. I let him handle the checking a time or two. Not very good at that. I let him use a debit card. Very good at that. I still let him use the debit card to get our groceries. He also good with cash. I am going to let him handle my estate-even though there not much at all. I trust him. He does have problems saving receipts though.

Payees shouldn't exist unless you have a guardian or the beneficiary wants one.

There was also a mistake made by SSI. It should of been put in his name when he turned 18 or 21. It was not.
https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0200502020

The decision about needing a payee is not made by a disabled beneficiary. It is made by SSA. A person who is capable of managing their own benefits cannot ask SSA to give their money to someone else to manage. And although you may not know any examples, there are plenty of developmentally disabled and/or organic brain damaged adults and/or drug addicts/alcoholics who do not make good decisions about spending money and have to have payees even if they don't want them. There are people who will spend every penny they get the day they get it and be hungry and homeless. But using your criteria, if they don't want a payee, they shouldn't have to have a payee and be allowed to be hungry and homeless, as long as they get to spend money the way they want.

Your son can provide current medical evidence from his treating doctor (a form SSA-787) and be made his payee in a very short time, the day he submits the evidence and files the application. And like I said, becoming his own payee does show SOME medical improvement but it doesn't automatically mean benefits will be ceased.

So he is an SSI recipient then? Never worked?

SSI is not paid for people who are not living in the US. So moving to Ecuador would mean zero SSI benefits. I don't know what kind of SSDI you think he would be waiving at age 65 or do you mean retirement Social Security?

I have read all your posts and am still confused.
Janke is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote