Legendary
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somewhere near here
Posts: 11,427
|
|
Legendary
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somewhere near here
Posts: 11,427
|
Imaging the spine is a curious concept. Statistically, there can be very little direct connection between what a radiologist reads in the image and what the patient feels. Some images are very accurate. Others don't make sense.
For example, there are many instances where there is no positive finding despite chronic pain. There are also many patients who have no symptoms despite images that show serious problems. This leaves some of the professionals in a quandary.
The last time I looked at the research, the probability of success from surgical treatment of spinal pain is about the same as that of shoulder surgery. About 1/3rd are in better condition after the surgery. About 1/3rd are the same and about 1/3rd are worse off.
My experience with chiros and others who have tried to treat my neck is about the same. Making the rounds of clinicians has been my best process. I keep trying someone new until I find the one who helps. I wish Madison, Wisconsin was closer to Boise, Idaho. I miss my chiropractor. My physical therapist costs much more and has a very busy schedule so it is hard to get scheduled to be seen by her.
__________________
Mark in Idaho
"Be still and know that I am God" Psalm 46:10
|