View Single Post
Old 10-26-2011, 12:47 AM
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mz Migraine View Post
Doesn't change the fact that Bulldog's statement is correct.

"Almost all?"
Do you have any links to back that up? There are various reasons why a person is cut off if employed PT or FT. Two of the main ones are:
1 - The person stopped going to medical treatment.
2 - Treating physician confirmed the patient is "no longer disabled."
I never said Bulldog was wrong. Quoting just the rule, to a student with a mental disability claim that has just been approved that wasn't even asking about PT work, is dangerous advice IMO.

The "almost all" was in reference to SSD beneficiaries (except the blind, and it seems like there is maybe one or two other exceptions), not that "almost all" will lose their benefits, but that accept for those few exceptions, a PT job will trigger greater scrutiny, the long form CDR, etc. If you really want linkage I'll hunt maņana, but I think my original sentence just wasn't clear.

I suspect under $700 in wages is safer, but perhaps Janke or lefthanded could give a real answer.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote