View Single Post
Old 02-18-2012, 09:23 AM
en bloc's Avatar
en bloc en bloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shenandoah Mountains, VA
Posts: 1,250
10 yr Member
en bloc en bloc is offline
Senior Member
en bloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shenandoah Mountains, VA
Posts: 1,250
10 yr Member
Default

It all depends on what the potential/suspected problem is as for what test is best. I've had both. Manometry cannot determine if aspiration is taking place which is the most important factor in swallowing problems (IMO)...fluoriscopic swallow study can tell immediately. It can also tell lots about delayed swallowing and other mechanic problems in that first few motions of the swallow, that the manometry cannot. Manometry is great for suspected motility problems, spasms, reflux, etc...where the fluoriscope is pretty much useless for these. So comes down to what you're looking for.

PH test is good to determine reflux. I don't think they put patients through the trauma of manometry just to determine length of esophagus. I believe they have been doing PH probes long before manometry was even widely used. Don't they just do a couple follow up x-rays for ph probe placement? Been a long time since I had it done, can't remember.

Last edited by en bloc; 02-18-2012 at 12:53 PM. Reason: Wrong test name
en bloc is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
mrsD (02-18-2012)