The judge chose some interesting decisions.

First because there was really no reason for the restraining order last month.
He took it off. It ended up being no need for it.

He told my daughter-in-law that if he harrass, or any thing to get in touch.

THen he asked the guy if he had done what was suggested. Or why he
had waited 6 years to want visitation.

The guy said, nothing directly to the three or four different ways the
judge asked him if he had done what he was suggested to do. He just
kept saying they hadn't returned. The people from dcs, or the police.

THen he wouldn't give a reason other than he was buying a house. And
changing jobs, and things like that for not doing his visitation. Oh and
he didn't have her phone number. (But my daughter-in-law had the same
phone number for 3 or 4 years) And her mother has always had the same
house phone number.

THen he said she moved, which she did about 3 years ago.

He never as the judge called him on answered the direct answer.

So the judge said. He was suspending the visitation, because it was
a divorce situation. SO he had to come back with the divorce case
to get that restarted. But that the other would all be brought in
too. With the police and all.

Pretty much telling him, he might end up in jail.


So my daughter-in-law didn't understand what suspend meant. So
I had the judge explain. So he said, I'm canceling visitation till
its brought before as a divorce case.

So that is what happened. for now.

Donna