I would like to express my celebration for the questions raised by our members, and although I remain open to all hypotheses, this one seems to be ignoring some research data on MS that has already been conducted and that leaves me scratching my head.

For example, if true, how is it that the hypothesis is only applicable to those in temperate climates; for research data has already shown that MS is rare in the far north and the far southern portions of the globe?

I would now like to learn what the "treatment" portion of this hypothesis is though; as I think that we have been given enough info on the hypothesis itself. Because of the lack of that information, the promotion of this hypothesis is sounding more and more like a sales pitch for a product of some sort.
There, I said it.

Thanks.

With love, Erika