New Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
|
Ok - first off I fully support giving disability to veterans with ALS (or any catastrophic disabling disease).
With that said is a 1.6% or 2% difference realling indicative of anything? Is it statistically significant? As a point of reference, the studies of Italian Soccer players showed they are 6 to 12 TIMES as likely as the general population to get ALS yet this study is still questioned as statistical noise.
How can 2% really prove anything as to the causation of ALS? Just a thought.
|