Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayandnay
If you get a chance, google NY Times January 11,2013 article on possible lawsuit settlement against bias aljs, because I think this has changed the landscape on being a mean judge who rules with a iron fist and rules not on facts right in front of him, but decides because he personally does not like or believe that person. Finally the little guy has a forum, it may take some time, a lawsuit, but now we have more than just Appeals Council to check their own people, plus Congress is wondering how one judge can approve 75 per cent versus the other guys 40 per cent. You better have your i"s dotted and T"s crossed.
|
It could be that the ALJ who approves 75% is the one not following the law and regulation. Just saying.
It is the job of an Administrative Law Judge to make a judgment and assess credibility. There are people who lie and exaggerate and pretend to be disabled. That is not intended to be a personal indictment, but an observation.
Since there is not enough money to pay the current obligations *edit* it is doubtful that Congress is going to make it easier to qualify. But who knows. *edit*