View Single Post
Old 01-31-2013, 07:26 PM
Conductor71's Avatar
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Conductor71 Conductor71 is offline
Senior Member
Conductor71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,474
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by soccertese View Post
my interpretation is they offered a possible explanation how oxidative stress can indirectly affect the normal parkin protein in pd'ers without the parkin mutation.

i didn't see anywhere where they were looking at cells that had the parkin mutation.
what i don't understand is how they treated human cells, were they cell lines?

regardless, the research tools ARE GETTING BETTER.
Agreed that the research tools are better. I definitely need to chill out; I didn't read it carefully enough to spout off. However, does this explain how we lose even more neurons in our locus coeruleus? In my mind, linking anything to gene mutations and only dopamine in the substantia nigra is just too narrow anymore. Of course, I would love it if things were that simple, but we have a lot of catching up to do in research on the loss of norepinephrine in PD.

Here is an interesting article kinda tying things together.

Oxidative Stress, DNA Damage, and c-Abl Signaling: At the Crossroad in Neurodegenerative Disease


Oh, good question on the cells. Looks like cultured cell lines... here is a link to the original article

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039694/

Laura
Conductor71 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
soccertese (01-31-2013)