View Single Post
Old 03-22-2013, 11:43 AM
nospam's Avatar
nospam nospam is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 835
10 yr Member
nospam nospam is offline
Member
nospam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 835
10 yr Member
Default

I am in the same boat as you. I saw Dr. Gelabert a year ago but had surgery with one of his former fellows, Niren Angle. Dr. Gelabert gave me an info sheet explaining that the transaxillary procedure was less invasive but had a 10-20% risk of recurrence and possible resurgery like you describe.

I also feel like the Botox is a temporary solution and we are in the process of scheduling supraclavicular full scalenectomy and neurolysis. I don't believe the supraclavicular scalenectomy is more invasive once the rib has already been removed. It should be actually be an easier procedure than either rib resection approach which is why Gelabert and disciples prefer the transaxillary approach even with the potential additional surgery.
__________________
Marc

.


ACDF C5-C6-C7 2/28/11

.


.


.


.
nospam is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote