View Single Post
Old 06-06-2013, 08:41 PM
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Janke Janke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 686
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicd577 View Post
i got denied on my ss claim last year on E because the court said that even tho i was disabled, they didn't expect it to last a year. well, it as, of course, and has gotten worse, even with meds and everything. my question is: now that the court has given me a specific reason, that they didn't expect it to last a year, is that the thing my atty has to prove, that it has and is expected to continue? can they throw in other stuff now, after my alj hearing, such as age, education, and the other generic stuff they usually love to deny people with? they mentioned none of that with the original denial, just that they acknowledge that i am currently disabled and unable to work, but that it wasn't expected to last a year.....any advice or anyone have dealt with this kind of denial before?
You have to meet all the requirements - expected to last a year, be severe, prevent you from doing past relevant work, prevent you from doing any work considering your age and education. Yes, there is more to it.
Janke is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
nicd577 (06-06-2013)