FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
ALS News & Research For postings of news or research links and articles related to ALS |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Grand Magnate
|
Initial SCALED unofficial report regarding online pacer study: count of the patients
There are 246 cases where whether the patient deployed the pacer is unreported, 185 cases where the pacer was reported deployed. Since the number of patients who deployed the pacer is substantially less than the number of patients who did not, a scaled column is added, increasing the difference found by 133% (thereby making the cohorts comparable: 185 * 133% ~ 246). The current status shows pacer users leading the others at the median, three, five and eight years . . . at the ten year threshold they are about the same. At the Texas (eleven and one half years) threshold nonusers appear to have a slight lead and at twenty years a strong lead, however, most pacer users have not had enough time to reach twenty years, further, at least four patients of these long term survivors would not have been eligible for the pacer because they have long been long term survivors rather than fresh cases. Hence, the pacer is currently emerging as leader in all temporal categories (subtract four patients from each scaled difference). Unofficial Pacer Study Summary: Scaled - Google Drive Unofficial Pacer Study Summary: Scaled - Google Drive ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Grand Magnate
|
"Not Reached (>33)" and "Not Reached (>133)" months ought to read "Not Reached (>33)" and "Not Reached (>33)" months in Table 2 for the Sham cohort of the RespiStimALS paper:
Early diaphragm pacing in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (RespiStimALS): a randomised controlled triple-blind trial Early diaphragm pacing in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (RespiStimALS): a randomised controlled triple-blind trial - PubMed in e-mail apparently from RespiStimALS's lead laparoscopic neurosurgeon. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Grand Magnate
|
These summary sheets are from my web observations of pulmonary pacing interested patients over the last about twenty-five years.
This brief summary was 'completed' when the number of pacing patients nearly equaled the number of patients undisclosed (and probably not pacing): Unofficial Pacer Summary: LTSumAlpha - Google Drive These summaries are nearly complete for patients involved at the time DiPALS and RespiStimALS published pacing reports: One of these sets of 'summaries' shows four fewer patients because they likely were ineligible because they passed their opportunity window before the pacer intervention was developed: All inclusive: Unofficial Pacer Study Summary: SCALED Pro+ - Google Drive Four omitted: Unofficial Pacer Study Summary: SCALED Pro- - Google Drive ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Diaphragm Pacing for ALS at a Crossroads Following Conflicting Trial Results | ALS News & Research | |||
Diaphragm pacing system implanted in a patient with ALS | ALS News & Research | |||
Diaphragmatic pacing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | ALS News & Research | |||
Diaphragm pacing in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | ALS News & Research | |||
Pacing (long post, sorry) | Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) |