advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2009, 02:20 PM #1
BAlive BAlive is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 15
15 yr Member
BAlive BAlive is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 15
15 yr Member
Confused Follow up angiogram..

So i met with a neuro interventional radiologist today at the request of my neurologist. I haven't had a follow up angiogram since the coiling in 2005 so I'm due. He told that he wanted to take a look at all all 4 major arteries going to the brain including the coiled left carotid. He said that by doing so he could see if I had any current or potential problems. That sounded great right up until he told me that there is a 1 in 300 chance of having a stroke during the procedure. Wow! now that scares the hell out of me. I know that i should have it done to make sure there are no problems, but that 1 in 300 is looming over my head. He then told me that its more like 1 in 2000 because of the way they do the procedure, but that still doesn't help but my nerves at ease seeing that he wants to poke around all four arteries...

So, I don't know. I put it on hold for right now and opted to have another MRA/MRI done for right now until I was ready for the angiogram. Ugggghhhhh.. I don't know what to do. Does the benifit out way the risk?

I need advice.. Please...
BAlive is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 01-29-2009, 02:41 AM #2
Lynn's Avatar
Lynn Lynn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 660
15 yr Member
Lynn Lynn is offline
Member
Lynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 660
15 yr Member
Default

My Neurosurgeon has only ever requested a CT Angiogram for me - not the traditional type because I have a bleeding disorder that would be too difficult to manage if something went wrong - and why my annie was clipped not coiled.

This is risk free - they just use a contrast dye and do a CT to see the blood vessels. The only good thing I can think of with a conventional angiogram in this case, though, is that if your annie needs more coils added, then they can do it while they are there.

I was told that if my aneurysm had been coiled, I would have to have regular angios in case the coils compacted and needed 'refilling'.

Up to you, but it may be worth having a CTA or MRA instead, and getting the angiogram later if required.

Cheers

Lyn
Lynn is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 08:41 AM #3
BAlive BAlive is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 15
15 yr Member
BAlive BAlive is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 15
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
My Neurosurgeon has only ever requested a CT Angiogram for me - not the traditional type because I have a bleeding disorder that would be too difficult to manage if something went wrong - and why my annie was clipped not coiled.

This is risk free - they just use a contrast dye and do a CT to see the blood vessels. The only good thing I can think of with a conventional angiogram in this case, though, is that if your annie needs more coils added, then they can do it while they are there.

I was told that if my aneurysm had been coiled, I would have to have regular angios in case the coils compacted and needed 'refilling'.

Up to you, but it may be worth having a CTA or MRA instead, and getting the angiogram later if required.

Cheers

Lyn
Yes, i've been researching alternatives like the CTA and the DSA. I don't think I have any immediate problems with the coils in the left carotid but I've been having pain and stuff on the right side of my head recently around my right eye, thats what has been worrying me the most. So I'm gonna follow up with my neuro and see what he thinks and then go from there..
BAlive is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:14 PM #4
Ruthie1959 Ruthie1959 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
Posts: 32
15 yr Member
Ruthie1959 Ruthie1959 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
Posts: 32
15 yr Member
Default

Hi,
There is risks with any invasive procedures, anytime you invade the body with foreign things, catheters, dyes, things like that, especially with things going to the brain, is a tricky, delicate procedure. If you have a good doc you trust and confidence in the facility, like I do I don't worry too much about the risks. These procedures are done alot and should be well perfected. They have to tell you the risks, its a legal thing for when you sign your consent. The decision is ultimately yours. If it is going to cause you to stress out then request to have the CT angeogram which is much less invasive, but not as accurate as the traditional angeogram, Good luck in what ever you decide to do,
Ruthie
Ruthie1959 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Angiogram Beth1957 Aneurysm 7 01-23-2009 09:17 AM
Follow-up after seeing foot dr Schumacher Peripheral Neuropathy 1 04-17-2008 01:10 AM
A Good Angiogram NHDebbie Aneurysm 1 12-14-2007 09:44 PM
I read my angiogram report today Sandel Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) 16 10-25-2007 05:59 PM
angiogram flopper Epilepsy 2 11-23-2006 08:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.