advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2016, 05:09 PM #1
Pharmgirlkelly Pharmgirlkelly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 20
8 yr Member
Pharmgirlkelly Pharmgirlkelly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 20
8 yr Member
Default Lab Test Help - Celiac or Not??

I was undergoing work up for MS-like symptoms and nothing has come up. However, in the process, the neurologist ordered celiac disease tests and everything was normal except for the Deamidated Gliadin Antibodies IgA. It was 24 with a normal range being 0-19. She repeated the lab with the same results. I am confused on what this would mean when it's the only one of the tests to be out of range. Any thoughts? I am scheduled for an upper and lower endoscopy in a few weeks. I questioned that as I just had a clean colonoscopy about 15 months ago and wasn't due back for 10 years. I thought the upper endoscopy would be enough to diagnose. So...I'll take thoughts on that as well please!! Thank you!
Pharmgirlkelly is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 04-14-2016, 06:16 AM #2
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,855
15 yr Member
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,855
15 yr Member
Default Given that lab result--

--the endoscopy is a good idea, as evidence of villious damage is the gold standard of celiac diagnosis and that can only be obtained by endoscopy.

The anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody test is the one most specific to villious damage of the small intestine (some of the other assays in a celiac panel are more sensitive but less specific than that one).

Also, an upper and lower endoscopy usually means they are going to look at your esophagus and stomach (upper) and duodenum and upper small intestine (lower). The latter (lower) is much more likely where evidence of celiac might be found because it involves looking at the small intestinal villi. Still, make sure they take samples from various locations--8 to 12 is better protocol than just one or two--as damage from celiac can be patchy and hard to find, especially in early stages, and is sometimes missed when insufficient samples are taken.
glenntaj is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test result help for celiac disease korkyo Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 7 08-19-2014 06:03 AM
Help interpreting Celiac test results Jolley71717 Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 1 04-26-2012 07:06 AM
Interpreting Celiac Test? sevenofnine Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 4 04-18-2012 12:57 PM
Celiac blood test questions celiacquestion Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 9 07-27-2008 03:10 PM
Frustrated re b12 deficiency and negative celiac test MotherMoon Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 7 10-27-2006 07:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.