advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2006, 09:31 PM #21
deb46 deb46 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
15 yr Member
deb46 deb46 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
15 yr Member
Default

Thanks for posting this link. Like you I have had some bad experiences with Avonex. My doctors keep telling me I need to get back on something but I have this deep gut feeling that keeps telling me NO. My experiences with my deep gut feelings during my life usually turns out to be right so I keep telling the doctors NO!
deb46 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 10-02-2006, 09:51 PM #22
Cherie's Avatar
Cherie Cherie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 305
15 yr Member
Cherie Cherie is offline
Member
Cherie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 305
15 yr Member
Default

I can look back at the last 10 years and see 5 of decline and 2 of Avonex and monthly steroids and feeling pretty crappy and not getting much better, then 3 and a half years on Rebif and getting better and better and better. I'd never have believed it possible 5 years ago that i could have recovered as much lost ground as I have especially with that horrendous foot injury thrown in the mix.

My recommendation: If you've only tried one thing and it hasn't worked, give one of the others a go. There's a good chance you'll hit on something that works for you.
Cherie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 10:41 PM #23
Harry Z Harry Z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 241
15 yr Member
Harry Z Harry Z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, Canada
Posts: 241
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Conclusion: Given the difference in baseline risk and severity levels across studies, ARR is the appropriate way to compare DMDs in the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. Results based on ARR showed that IFNB-1a sc has comparable therapeutic effect on efficacy measures when compared to natalizumab.
I'm sure when the insurance companies' docs read this kind of report, they aren't exactly going to be eager in recommending that Tysabri be covered without a lot of red tape.

Harry
Harry Z is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.