Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-01-2007, 04:34 PM #14
msladyinca's Avatar
msladyinca msladyinca is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 11
15 yr Member
msladyinca msladyinca is offline
Junior Member
msladyinca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 11
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
At this point in time, Tysabri is recommended for people who have failed at other proven and SAFER therapies. I am reluctantly impressed by it's track record (over this last year), but I think it is premature and irresponsible to recommend such a treatment to people who are new to treatment options.
I believe that it is highly reckless and irresponsible to promote incorrect information Re: Tysabri, as the correct recommendation for Tysabri by the FDA is: "it is generally recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to, or cannot tolerate, any of the other disease-modifying therapies". http://www.nationalmssociety.org/sit...ds_natalizumab

Also, Tysabri is being prescribed as a first line and/or second line defense against MS.

Quote:
Our Neuro's have biases, that are NOT necessarily based on anything concrete. All of the CRABs have equal efficacy
Again, this is incorrect as Tysabri and the ABCRs differ substantially in efficacy. See the proven data: "The relapse reduction rates used were: TYSABRI was 67%, Avonex (Interferon beta-1a IM) 32%, Betaseron(R) (Interferon beta-1b) 34%, Copaxone(R) (glatiramer acetate) 29%, and Rebif(R) (Interferon beta-1a SC) 32%."

TYSABRI® Shows Reduction in Steroid Use/Hospitalizations & ABCR Comparison
http://http://www.elan.com/News/full.asp?ID=913012

Considering that there are over 14,000 MS patients currently on Tysabri therapy, with 300 patients being added weekly (with some of us receiving outstanding results), there is a distinct possibility that their neurologists believe the proven data on Tysabri (including the submitted three-year safety data), and not the inaccurate postings of same on a message board.

Quote:
I'd certainly recommend giving that [LDN] a go before trying Tysabri
Bethany, FYI... LDN is not an FDA approved drug for MS and it requires a prescription that needs to be filled at a "compound" pharmacy. Therefore it is my suggestion that you discuss your options for effectively treating your active MS with your treating MS doctor.

Whatever your decision, I wish you only the best and a speedy recovery from your current symptomatology.

Have a great week everyone.

Lauren

__________________
Our todays are only stepping stones for our tomorrows. :

Please feel free to visit my blog: Living with MS (My Tysabri Diary)
.
I'd love to hear from you!
.
msladyinca is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Progression of PD and URATE levels ZucchiniFlower Parkinson's Disease 0 07-13-2007 07:11 PM
This bloody progression! AfterMyNap Multiple Sclerosis 34 05-22-2007 08:33 AM
Is this progression? Adastra Peripheral Neuropathy 5 12-31-2006 01:54 AM
"The greatest improvement occurred in activities of daily living," Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 1 09-01-2006 07:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.