advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2008, 09:44 PM #11
tkrik's Avatar
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
tkrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
Default

Being cognitively challenged at times, that was quite a bit of information to absorb so bear with me if this was in Jack's post. In order to get an adequate amount of D3 one must get an adequate amount of sunlight with ultraviolet B. This is challenging for some in many parts of the country. Not so for the southwestern states. When the weather is cooler, I sit out in the sun for 15 minutes a day give or take. When it is hot, as in now, I will sit by a window. Would sitting by the window be enough?

BTW - I lived most my life on Long Island and CT. Additionally, I know of 4 people that were born and raised in AZ that have MS. So I am not 100% convinced on the vitamin D theory.
tkrik is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 06-19-2008, 09:52 PM #12
watsonsh watsonsh is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,642
15 yr Member
watsonsh watsonsh is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,642
15 yr Member
Default

There is also a good thread on Vitamin D in the vitamin forum.

also I remember an article where they did a test on people in Hawaii (sunny all the time right) and there was a good proportion that had low vitamin D.

So there are people that either do not absorbe well through the sun or dont convert well was what I think it said.

My Vit D was low and I have been supplementing with 1000 iu a day and it has definitely helped with muscle pain and fatigue.
watsonsh is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 10:25 PM #13
Kristi's Avatar
Kristi Kristi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Metro detroit area of Michigan
Posts: 200
15 yr Member
Kristi Kristi is offline
Member
Kristi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Metro detroit area of Michigan
Posts: 200
15 yr Member
Default

In Rod we trust Go Blue !!! love it Shelley.Well, I sure hope my Vit D levels will be normal in 8 weeks when my neuro will do another blood test to check my levels again,I wonder if she'll want me to stay on Vit D I don't know because I want to stay on it as it sounds like it really can help me.

Go Blue !!!!!
__________________
Diagnosed Probable MS 9/21/07
.

Started Copaxone 10/16/07


3-6-9 the goose drank wine the monkey chewed tobacoo on the street car line the line broke the monkey got choked and they all went to heaven in a little row boat...
.
Kristi is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 03:34 PM #14
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
Default vit D

FYi: I had posted this on another forum in May.

There is a great article on Vitamin D starting on page 44 of May 2008 Cooking Light magazine. It predicts that when the new levels get reset in 2010, they will be increased. ( They don't reset nutrition levels but every 10 years.)

"In the absence of it, you're asking the body to defend itself with one hand tied behind its back."

I was surprised b/c it said that a fair skinned person manufactures as much as 15,000 IU in 30 minutes with optimal sunlight conditions, so that is why they think giving people 10,000 IU as a supplement is okay!

The normal values for daily intake are 200 to 400 IU according to your age, but this information is a decade old.

It gives guidelines on the time of day for the sun to be at a 45 degree angle above the horizon and speaks about those of us who live above the 35 degree of latittude ( North Carolina to Southern California).

An spf of just 8 will block 98 percent of your skin's vitamin D production. So we should not have it on all the time.

They suggest having Vitamin D levels checked with bloodwork for something that insurance usually covers like a cholesterol panel or any other annual test. However they think you should always check with your insurance company first.

Most public libraries have Cooking Light magazine in the periodical area.
starfish is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Kristi (06-20-2008)
Old 06-20-2008, 03:37 PM #15
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
Default

FYI: I had posted this in another forum last month.

There is a great article on Vitamin D starting on page 44 of this month's Cooking Light magazine. It predicts that when the new levels get reset in 2010, they will be increased. ( They only reset nutrition level every 10 years.)

"In the absence of it,"... (vitamin D) ..." you're asking the body to defend itself with one hand tied behind its back."

I was surprised b/c it said that a fair skinned person manufactures as much as 15,000 IU in 30 minutes with optimal sunlight conditions, so that is why they think giving people 10,000 IU as a supplement is okay!

The normal values for daily intake are 200 to 400 IU according to your age, but this information is a decade old.

It gives guidelines on the time of day for the sun to be at a 45 degree angle above the horizon and speaks about those of us who live above the 35 degree of latittude ( North Carolina to Southern California).

An spf of just 8 will block 98 percent of your skin's vitamin D production. So we should not have it on all the time.

They suggest having Vitamin D levels checked with bloodwork for something that insurance usually covers like a cholesterol panel or any other annual test. However they think you should always check with your insurance company first.

Most public libraries have Cooking Light magazine in the periodical area.
starfish is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
tkrik (06-20-2008)
Old 06-20-2008, 03:42 PM #16
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
starfish starfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 166
15 yr Member
Default

Tkrik, you would be surprised how people modifiy life in Arizona and Texas.

I have lived in both places. By May it is 105 in Az. You go out very early in the am or late evening, when less direct sun to do anything outside. Cars have tint so the temperature does not get so hot your windows blow out.

I'll never forget TX. I remember sticking my head out the door and it felt like I was putting it in an oven. Only when we could go to the pool club did we go out during the day.
starfish is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
tkrik (06-20-2008)
Old 06-20-2008, 03:43 PM #17
watsonsh watsonsh is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,642
15 yr Member
watsonsh watsonsh is offline
Grand Magnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,642
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristi View Post
In Rod we trust Go Blue !!! love it Shelley.Well, I sure hope my Vit D levels will be normal in 8 weeks when my neuro will do another blood test to check my levels again,I wonder if she'll want me to stay on Vit D I don't know because I want to stay on it as it sounds like it really can help me.

Go Blue !!!!!
Yep Kristi,

Counting down to the start of the season.

If I were you after the 8 weeks I would go on a maintainence dose of like 1000iu a day of D3. Otherwise over time it will just deplete again.
watsonsh is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Kristi (06-20-2008)
Old 06-20-2008, 04:13 PM #18
tkrik's Avatar
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
tkrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
Default

Starfish - Thank you so much. That is the information I was kind of looking for.
tkrik is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 06:43 PM #19
jackD's Avatar
jackD jackD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland outside WASH DC
Posts: 258
15 yr Member
jackD jackD is offline
Member
jackD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland outside WASH DC
Posts: 258
15 yr Member
Default Risk assessment for vitamin D

I think it is very unwise for amost anyone to exceed 10,000 IU of Vitamin d3.

I take a total of 4,200 IUs of Vit D3 in supplement form daily.

jackD

p.s UL = Upper Level intake safe amount


Quote:
1: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):6-18.

Risk assessment for vitamin D.

Hathcock JN, Shao A, Vieth R, Heaney R.

Council for Responsible Nutrition, Washington, DC 20036-5114, USA.

The objective of this review was to apply the risk assessment methodology used by the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) to derive a revised safe Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for vitamin D. New data continue to emerge regarding the health benefits of vitamin D beyond its role in bone.

The intakes associated with those benefits suggest a need for levels of supplementation, food fortification, or both that are higher than current levels. A prevailing concern exists, however, regarding the potential for toxicity related to excessive vitamin D intakes.

The UL established by the FNB for vitamin D (50 microg, or 2000 IU) is not based on current evidence and is viewed by many as being too restrictive, thus curtailing research, commercial development, and optimization of nutritional policy.

Human clinical trial data published subsequent to the establishment of the FNB vitamin D UL published in 1997 support a significantly higher UL.

We present a risk assessment based on relevant, well-designed human clinical trials of vitamin D.

Collectively, the absence of toxicity in trials conducted in healthy adults that used vitamin D dose > or = 250 microg/d (10,000 IU vitamin D3) supports the confident selection of this value as the UL.

PMID: 17209171 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
jackD is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Kristi (06-20-2008), tkrik (06-20-2008)
Old 06-20-2008, 07:00 PM #20
tkrik's Avatar
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
tkrik tkrik is offline
Wise Elder
tkrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,403
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackD View Post
I think it is very unwise for amost anyone to exceed 10,000 IU of Vitamin d3.

I take a total of 4,200 IUs of Vit D3 in supplement form daily.

jackD

p.s UL = Upper Level intake safe amount
Too much of a "good" thing can actually be really bad if not toxic. I have seen it over and over. Very sad.
tkrik is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So should i or should i not take b12 vitamin? Monica de Lara Peripheral Neuropathy 24 01-12-2012 05:41 AM
Mrs D - Vitamin Help? BEGLET Peripheral Neuropathy 22 02-10-2008 07:00 PM
Vitamin C? daniella Vitamins, Nutrients, Herbs and Supplements 9 12-08-2007 05:50 PM
Vitamin A carolyn_lsc Vitamins, Nutrients, Herbs and Supplements 5 12-05-2006 01:26 PM
Vitamin D and RSD? Noble Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) 1 10-05-2006 04:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.