NeuroTalk Support Groups

NeuroTalk Support Groups (https://www.neurotalk.org/)
-   Multiple Sclerosis (https://www.neurotalk.org/multiple-sclerosis/)
-   -   Tysabri Information and Check In part 2 (https://www.neurotalk.org/multiple-sclerosis/84538-tysabri-information-check-2-a.html)

legzzalot 01-28-2010 10:05 PM

Well, I may or may not be getting my infusion on Monday. Seems my insurance deductible went from $1000 a year to $1500 without any notification to me! On the plus side, i was approved for medicaid due to the not being able to work thing... still waiting in disability decision but that is a whole new topic. So I was approved for medicaid and it was back dated to jan 1... I was told.... but I still have not received my card or any info on it. But I still have my Cobra until mid Feb.

The hospital was told by the Cobra ins that I had to pay the $1500 for the infusion. They are willing to make a payment plan with me, provided I come up with at least $300 by Monday.... Kind of hard to do when I haven't worked in over a year and SSDI has me in limbo once again... My only income right now is child support... so now I dunno. Hoping it can be resolved tomorrow.

Grammie 2 3 01-31-2010 03:13 PM

Tysabri #42 past Fri
 
Still love my Ty but concerned about odds of pml with over 40 infusions :( More info now at chefarztfrau.de/?page_id=716 On this site it lists a pml case as having 52 infusions; only possible if from trials and they haven't counted those users in the stats. (now I'm wondering if in the U.S. - think it was :confused:) Wish my rememberer was better :p
I found on another article that there are 2,000 on Ty over 3yrs. If this is world wide:( if only U.S. better but, still not great.

Wishing all of us well,
Linda

Natalie8 02-04-2010 01:31 AM

Well, darn!! :mad: I took my prophylactic antibiotics (the day before, of, and after the infusion) and then 2 days after I stopped I got a UTI again!! Ergh. I've wiped it out with a week of Cipro and a shot of 1 gram of Rocephin from the urologist.

But I don't think the neurologist will be happy. Clearly I am now destined for continuing the Tysabri every 8 weeks plan. The urologist did give me a week's worth of antibiotics to take when I get future infusions--maybe that will prevent any more but I don't like having to take so many antibiotics. On the other hand, I don't want to go off Tysabri. :(

Riverwild 02-04-2010 10:13 AM

Yikes Natalie!

I do NOT envy you! One was enough for me!

Riverwild 02-04-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by legzzalot (Post 615538)
Well, I may or may not be getting my infusion on Monday. Seems my insurance deductible went from $1000 a year to $1500 without any notification to me! On the plus side, i was approved for medicaid due to the not being able to work thing... still waiting in disability decision but that is a whole new topic. So I was approved for medicaid and it was back dated to jan 1... I was told.... but I still have not received my card or any info on it. But I still have my Cobra until mid Feb.

The hospital was told by the Cobra ins that I had to pay the $1500 for the infusion. They are willing to make a payment plan with me, provided I come up with at least $300 by Monday.... Kind of hard to do when I haven't worked in over a year and SSDI has me in limbo once again... My only income right now is child support... so now I dunno. Hoping it can be resolved tomorrow.

Legzz,

Have you heard anymore as to whether you can get some help?
There are options out there. Biogen cannot help with infusion costs but one of these resources may be able to help. You could also call Medicaid and tell them what is going on and maybe they will give you your numbers, since you are already approved.

GENERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Partnership for Prescription Assistance (888) 477-2669
The Medicine Program (800) 921-0072
NeedyMeds: (978) 865-4115
National Organization of Rare Disorders (NORD): (203) 744-0100
Rx Council (866) 794-3571
Alternative Funding Group (866) 426-2906
Patient Access Network (866) 316-7261
Bridges to Access (866) 728-4368
Rx Outreach (800) 769-3880

Grammie 2 3 02-04-2010 12:15 PM

Natalie, so sorry you just keep getting UTIs :hug: I give you so much credit for hanging in ... I love my Ty but don't know if I could/would be as tough as you! I guess I would have to be... Maybe every 8 weeks will give your body time to recover so you won't get a UTI. I truly hope so!
Linda

Harryp 02-04-2010 03:07 PM

PMLs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Riverwild (Post 534677)
Hello MdotDdot and welcome to the Tysabri thread.

I have to disagree with some of your post.

The data since Tysabri's return to market shows that PML is NOT necessarily fatal anymore. PML CAN be treated. When caught early, there may be little damage. The key to preventing damage due to PML is VIGILANCE, and those of us on Tysabri are pretty vigilant by now, and so are the neurologists prescribing Tysabri, and the infusion centers administering Tysabri.

As to traditional therapies, who should choose? We get sent home with a pack of info from the drugmakers, and told to come back when we pick a therapy. It's OUR choice. It should BE our choice no matter what. I planned to go on Tysabri and was scheduled for my first infusion when it was pulled from market in 2005. I hadn't taken any other therapy prior to that and the ONLY reason I agreed to do Copaxone was because MY CHOICE was no longer available and Copaxone seemed to be the least obnoxious of the drugs available.

I waited and worked to get Tysabri back on the market, while suffering from relapse after relapse on Copaxone. Copaxone obviously wasn't working for me, so it would be considered inadequate. When Tysabri returned to market, I went on it as soon as I could get on it. I haven't looked back since.

It's my brain. It's my body. I am an intelligent person and I can weigh the risks and benefits using the available information. I would still make the same choice today, to use the most efficacious therapy available to prevent relapses and slow the progression of disability.

Tysabri is prescribed as both first and second line therapy. The FDA clarified that back in 2006. Tysabri is generally recommended for patients who have had an inadequate response to or are unable to tolerate alternate MS therapies. I cannot tolerate losing my brain to this disease, nor can I tolerate drugs marketed to people with MS that, at best, give the patient a 34% efficacy rate.

I haven't had a relapse since I started Tysabri and it's been over two years now. My MRIs are tremendous. Not only do I have no new lesions and no enhancing lesions, many lesions seen previously are reduced in size or gone completely. My vision is back to pre-diagnosis levels, my spasticity and fatigue have been cut to 1/3 or better than where they were before Tysabri. My thinking is clear and I can read a book again without having to re-read every paragraph I previously read. I can retain information again. I'm not dizzy or walking like someone who is intoxicated. I can drive. I can work full time and work more than one job. Time is brain. So far, I'm holding on to mine in what I consider to be the best way that I can.

So, do you have MS? What therapy are you on? How's it working for you?

Hi I'm a newby and need to ask some very basic questions - sorry if my lack of basic knowledge is irksome to some of you more experienced members.
1/ What is PML? (Looked it up in the site med directory to no effect)
2/ What other side effects should I be aware of?
My granddaughter the has been advised by her neurologist to change from Copaxone having previously spent 3 1/2 years on Rebisf. She is very concerned about serious side effects!
Regards
Harryp

Riverwild 02-05-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harryp (Post 617926)
Hi I'm a newby and need to ask some very basic questions - sorry if my lack of basic knowledge is irksome to some of you more experienced members.
1/ What is PML? (Looked it up in the site med directory to no effect)
2/ What other side effects should I be aware of?
My granddaughter the has been advised by her neurologist to change from Copaxone having previously spent 3 1/2 years on Rebisf. She is very concerned about serious side effects!
Regards
Harryp

Hi Harryp and welcome to Neurotalk! :)

Soory to hear why you are here but kudos to you for your research for your granddaughter.

I'll give you some links for reading and if you have questions come on back and someone will help you find the answers.

1) PML: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/000674.htm

2) Other side effects: Everyone's different. Some folks have no side effects and some have a lot of them. The best place to read about side effects is from the patient medication guide. You can find that by going here: http://www.tysabri.com/en_US/tysb/si...I-medguide.pdf

There's a wash out period before starting Tysabri that lasts 2 weeks or more depending on what drugs have been used before Tysabri and how long the neurologist feels the patient might need.

I hope this helps! Feel free to ask whatever you need to know and if someone can answer, they will.

komokazi 02-05-2010 11:30 AM

PML Info just became public on FDA site
 
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/.../ucm199872.htm

Table at the bottom breaking out PML rates in the US and Europe.

shayna 02-08-2010 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grammie 2 3 (Post 616352)
Still love my Ty but concerned about odds of pml with over 40 infusions :( More info now at chefarztfrau.de/?page_id=716 On this site it lists a pml case as having 52 infusions; only possible if from trials and they haven't counted those users in the stats. (now I'm wondering if in the U.S. - think it was :confused:) Wish my rememberer was better :p
I found on another article that there are 2,000 on Ty over 3yrs. If this is world wide:( if only U.S. better but, still not great.

Wishing all of us well,
Linda

Grammie, I was just at that site and they now have 33 PML cases but the last 2 are unconfirmed. There was a woman in the USA who was listed as having PML after 52 doses....# 24 on the list...... and another woman in France listed as having PML after 53 doses.....# 30 on the list. The most recent unconfirmed cases are listed as having 45 and 46 doses of Ty.

I love my Ty but the more I read about PML the more concerned I am. I didn't get my dose last Friday. I'm putting it off 2 weeks because I'm going to California again for my grandson's b'day and I don't want to worry about the side effects I always get. But, I've never gone 6 weeks between infusions except for last summer when I was ill and couldn't have an infusion. Darn.......I hope I've made the right decision. If it does go ok I will try to continue to get an infusion every 6 weeks instead of every 4 weeks.

Good luck everyone...hugs,
Shayna

komokazi 02-09-2010 06:24 PM

Biogen Earnings Transcript related to Tysabri/PML

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1876...e=yahoo&page=3

“We continue to explore avenues for stratifying risk. One key area of focus is on the development of a serological assay to detect the presence of JC virus antibodies. We are currently planning to initiate a clinical study to determine whether antibody negative patients are at lower risk for PML. Our aim is to make these studies widely acceptable to TYSABRI patients worldwide.”

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1876...e=yahoo&page=7

“Joshua Schimmer – Leerink Swann, LLC

What is the design of the study and what will you specifically be measuring or following?

James C. Mullen

If we’re talking about the serological assay study, it’s basically simply a blood draw where we take the blood, store it. We actually have a couple of studies, in one study we will verify that the findings we got from our strata samples is the same. We will match it up with urine JC Virus. In the other study we’ll collect blood and see whether or not when patients develop PML they were antibody positive at that prior time point or not.

Joshua Schimmer – Leerink Swann, LLC

Is it just the antibody? What are the JC virus specific T cell function assays or the viral protein assays that you’ll also be monitoring? Do you only check those if patients are positive or do you test everyone and see who gets PML?

James C. Mullen

Those will be separate studies done in a focused way in conjunction with some registries and other studies going on in Europe and elsewhere we will look for additional biomarkers. They will include cellular assays as you indicate that test immune response, they’ll also look for mutation in JC virus. If we get a technology we can use to measure mutations and so forth but there are some studies that are going to be underway for example in Germany that we intend to collaborate with the investigators who are doing those studies.”

komokazi 02-10-2010 04:44 PM

Excerpts from Elan's Conference Call'
 
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1878...nscript?page=8

"Carlos V. Paya M.D., Ph.D.

Annie, this is Carlos. Thank you for the questions. The three sub questions, the assay — there are a number of steps that are very clearly outlined to regulatory pathways so the assays can become commercially available. One of them is to gather additional information because as I mentioned, the data that we have as to how this assay was generated was using source samples that had been prospectively collected, but that was not the whole purpose of those collections. So we really need to now do a very thorough evaluation using prospectively collected sample studies where we are going to study in the upcoming months trying to validate two things.

One is the sensitivity and the specificity of this test by comparing serologies we saw with viruria using PTR. That’s one of the ways to validate test. The other one is to then – once you have a test validated is that seropositivity always precedes or concurs with the presence of PML. I recall that already with the PML cases we have, we did have 11 cases where we had samples drawn ,and those 11 cases were already positive. Our goal with these additional studies is to now confirm those findings, which will then bring the reassurance for everyone that it can clinically predict the PML appearance. With those two packages then, that is what you proceed forward with regulatory path for approval to become a commercial test.

In the meantime physician incorporating and signing up with these studies will have the chance to be running the test in their patient samples. And therefore have the ability to understand more results coming out to them. "

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1878...nscript?page=9

"Carlos V. Paya M.D., Ph.D.

I’ll take a number of questions there. Maybe Shane can help us with the profitable numbers in the US. So with regards to the exact timing, I cannot provide any guidance right now. We are in the midst of discussions with both regulators in the US and Europe. So we can have additional strategy after this discussions after the – kind of narrowing down the timing. But right now our objective is to as quickly as possible, roll out these two separate studies. Again, one to validate the (inaudible) in perspective samples. And two, by the clinical reliability to predict PML. Those data need to be available, I think, for a robust package for rapid approval. (Inaudible) discussions we’re having with the regulators. "

komokazi 02-10-2010 05:36 PM

Based on the above posts, Tysabri patients should check with their Neurologists to see if they'll be participating in one or both of the two JC Virus Antibody assay studies.

legzzalot 02-10-2010 06:35 PM

Question for you lovely Ty users! Went in earlier this week for #3, they didn't do any blood work this time. I don't know if it from the new ins or what but they always took blood before though I was never told why.

komokazi 02-11-2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by legzzalot (Post 620461)
Question for you lovely Ty users! Went in earlier this week for #3, they didn't do any blood work this time. I don't know if it from the new ins or what but they always took blood before though I was never told why.

I've been on the drug 3+ years and haven't had one blood draw at the time of the infusion. I've had blood drawn for testing at separate appointments (every 6 to 9 months) but I also have good veins.

Chris

Riverwild 02-12-2010 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by legzzalot (Post 620461)
Question for you lovely Ty users! Went in earlier this week for #3, they didn't do any blood work this time. I don't know if it from the new ins or what but they always took blood before though I was never told why.

Like Komokazi, I haven't had blood draws at any of my infusions. I have bloodwork done every 6 months, and see my neuro every three months. I have heard of people who have draws at infusion but I don't know why.

You should ask why you have them and get details. Are you in a trial? You should also ask them why they didn't do it this past infusion. They are human and maybe they forgot?:p

When something is new or different I always ask why, cause I am a pain in the ... infusion center...:D

legzzalot 02-12-2010 09:49 PM

LOl pain in the infusion center? you too?? They run screaming when they see me coming! No one wants to be the one to stick me because NONE of them can ever get it on the first try.

There was this one time, the chick was great, Iv was in first try and all. 10 minutes later it blew and my whole arm swole up.

Riverwild 02-13-2010 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by legzzalot (Post 621244)
LOl pain in the infusion center? you too?? They run screaming when they see me coming! No one wants to be the one to stick me because NONE of them can ever get it on the first try.

There was this one time, the chick was great, Iv was in first try and all. 10 minutes later it blew and my whole arm swole up.


It's not the stick that scares them, it's me...;)

Riverwild 02-17-2010 08:26 PM

1 Attachment(s)
New $10.00 co-pay program for Tysabri. It does NOT help with infusion costs , just the drug. The brochure should be available in your neurologist's office, or I believe you can call MSActiveSource and they will steer you to the right person to talk to.

Natalie8 02-17-2010 08:43 PM

I get my blood drawn every 3 months to test how my liver is doing on Tysabri. Usually they collect the blood when I go in for my infusion--that way I don't have to make a second trip to the lab to get the blood drawn. It saves being poked twice!

I have to say, I just read that conference call with Elan regarding the assay to test for JC antibodies. The doctor Carlos V. Paya M.D., Ph.D., who is answering questions, is really bad at explaining things and answering questions-I can't follow half of what he is saying!! And it's not because it's technical/medical language!

agate 02-18-2010 01:22 PM

Now there have been 35 cases of PML
 
There have now been 35 cases of PML in Tysabri patients:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...ase-cases.html

They're saying that the risk is still within the expected range, and so Tysabri is still considered safe.

Natalie8 02-18-2010 11:04 PM

Here is a link to an article coming out in "The Lancet" in March 2010 on the JC virus, PML, Tysabri and the immune system.

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...006-5/abstract

Grammie 2 3 02-19-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by agate (Post 623201)
There have now been 35 cases of PML in Tysabri patients:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...ase-cases.html

They're saying that the risk is still within the expected range, and so Tysabri is still considered safe.

It was good to read that 11 of the 35 are in the US. I'm pretty sure that 2/3 of the people on Ty are in the US with a little less than 1/3 getting pml.
Linda

komokazi 02-21-2010 01:54 PM

Looks like the JC Virus Antibody Assay will be here soon
 
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/N...m=Elan&rank=36



http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/N...ntibody&rank=1

Natalie8 02-21-2010 02:48 PM

That's great news!! BUT....my question is this: the time frame for the studies is 2 years so does that mean this assay will not be commercially available until 2-3 years from now? :(

Riverwild 02-21-2010 05:14 PM

I think we will be the people testing it, Natalie...

komokazi 02-21-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Natalie8 (Post 624315)
That's great news!! BUT....my question is this: the time frame for the studies is 2 years so does that mean this assay will not be commercially available until 2-3 years from now? :(

The trials are what Biogen/Elan have to do to get the JC Virus antibody assay into the label for Tysabri as reducing the PML risk.

Natalie8 02-21-2010 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riverwild (Post 624369)
I think we will be the people testing it, Natalie...

Oh, so the doctors will soon have the test in their office and sign everyone up for the clinical trials? Since I'm now on the 8 week Tysabri cycle I hope I can still get a test. Oh, and if they test us, will Biogen even tell us whether we are positive or negative? I worry they won't because they don't want people dropping off of Tysabri if they are positive.

I am still confused!

Harry Z 02-22-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Natalie8 (Post 623390)
Here is a link to an article coming out in "The Lancet" in March 2010 on the JC virus, PML, Tysabri and the immune system.

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...006-5/abstract

Had a friend who is involved in MS research look at this article and tell me what it means...

Basically, Tysabri caused an increase in the proliferation of the viruses but the body's humoral response remained stable. This means that the body wasn't making any antibodies to the viruses so it wasn't launching an attack. This is why it said that although there was an increase in the viruses there was no sign of reactivation. One only would see symptoms of reactivation if the immune system was launching an attack as that is what creates the symptoms. If the virus actually gets so concentrated it will interfere with function and then of course you have morbidity which can be fatal. The viruses were being proliferated in the body but the immune system wasn't launching an attack and that certainly is not good!

There still appears to be so much we don't know about PML and it's connection with Tysabri. Hopefully this test will become available soon.

Harry

komokazi 02-22-2010 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Z (Post 624561)
Had a friend who is involved in MS research look at this article and tell me what it means...

Basically, Tysabri caused an increase in the proliferation of the viruses but the body's humoral response remained stable. This means that the body wasn't making any antibodies to the viruses so it wasn't launching an attack.

Harry

Not sure how your friend came up his summary as it appears to be totally opposite to what the investigators determined.

This is what the scientific experts concluded in the paper "Interpretation
Natalizumab increases cellular immune responses specific to viruses and myelin proteins in the peripheral blood after 1 year, without evidence of viral reactivation."

Harry Z 02-23-2010 01:47 PM

Quote:

This is what the scientific experts concluded in the paper "Interpretation Natalizumab increases cellular immune responses specific to viruses and myelin proteins in the peripheral blood after 1 year, without evidence of viral reactivation."
Will have to send your info to my friend and see what comes back. This stuff is beyond my understanding.

Harry

Harry Z 02-23-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by komokazi (Post 624684)
Not sure how your friend came up his summary as it appears to be totally opposite to what the investigators determined.

This is what I got back and it kind of makes sense to me.

Harry
_____________________

There is difference between cellular immune response and humoral immune response. Cellular immune response, also referred to as a Th1 response, is a cell mediated response indicative of inflammation and cell destruction. Which is what Tysabri increased. The humoral response, which the article states remained unchanged, is a Th2 response in which the immune cells produce antibodies to viruses to destroy and prevent further and future infection in the body by the viruses. The article states that the humoral response was unchanged yet the cellular immune response was increased. This indicates that the virus is proliferating and causing cell destruction and the immune system isn't fighting back by producing antibodies. Thus, this is a silent destruction going on and the reason that they say there is no evidence of reactivation is because the body isn't launching an attack. This attack would normally produce the outward symptoms and reactivation is often measured by the number of antibodies being produced by the body.

___________________

komokazi 02-23-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Z (Post 625090)
This is what I got back and it kind of makes sense to me.

Harry
_____________________
_________________

The explanation still makes no sense to me. The summary to me states that cellular immune response to viruses is increased in the blood which makes sense given Tysabri's mechanism of action of confining antibodies to the bloodstream.

Obviously the problem with PML is that the virus is out of the bloodstream and into the CNS and Tysabri keeps antibodies out of the CNS.

Harry Z 02-24-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by komokazi (Post 625107)
The explanation still makes no sense to me. The summary to me states that cellular immune response to viruses is increased in the blood which makes sense given Tysabri's mechanism of action of confining antibodies to the bloodstream.

Obviously the problem with PML is that the virus is out of the bloodstream and into the CNS and Tysabri keeps antibodies out of the CNS.

I guess the question remains is do you really want viruses (not just JCV) proliferating in your bloodstream which Tysabri seems to allow. Maybe some very scientific person will see this and comment.

Harry

komokazi 02-24-2010 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Z (Post 625303)
I guess the question remains is do you really want viruses (not just JCV) proliferating in your bloodstream which Tysabri seems to allow. Maybe some very scientific person will see this and comment.

Harry

I guess you didn't understand my reply. The abstract you referenced states that the immune response is increased in the bloodstream. There is no viral proliferation in the bloodstream and won't be because of the increased immune response there.

The issues with Tysabri relate to infections outside of the bloodstream - I believe the only safety signal that has been confirmed through commercial use is PML.

Chemar 02-24-2010 10:11 AM

harry, please remember that this thread is for those who are using or inquiring about tysabri

you have been asked before to start new thread for comments or critique

FinLady 02-24-2010 02:24 PM

Hi all:) Wondering about other experiences with Ty. I tried copax, but late in my 2nd year my IPIRs got too frequent. I've been on Rebif for almost a year, and then had an allergic reaction to the med this past week. :eek:

My doc thinks that Ty should be the next step, and I'll be discussing it with the hubby tonight since we're a united front on the MS stuff - but also wanted to get other opinons. Been reading some of what's been posted, so it's going to be an interesting decision ahead. The above issues with the other DMD's as well as other meds make me leary to try this, but trying to decide whether or not to give this a shot.

Thanks for listening. :)

barb02 02-24-2010 06:59 PM

Jenn, I think you know my story. Allergic to betaseron, too many severe IPIR's on copaxone, infusion/allergic reactions on tysabri and the presence of antibodies. I know this is a tough decision to make. In a way I am glad that I tried tysabri despite the reactions because if I hadn't, I guess I would always be wondering if it was the one treatment that would help. The risk of PML's obviously also has to be considered.:hug:

legzzalot 02-25-2010 11:59 AM

FIN-> mY experiences: I did Copax-> had no bad reactions other then injections site bumps/itching, which is normal for putting a needle in your skin. However, stopped taking it and almost all of my sx went away within 10 days, redid MRI and found C aggrivated the MS and I had a whole mess of new lesions.

Then I refused DMDs for a while, gave up beef and pork went on strict diet and vitamin regiment, worked great (Only had a few sx left) until we moved and the MS flared again. Doc wanted me on Rebif, but agreed to try Av first since it was less shots during the week. Had horrible reactions to Av, eventually started breaking out in hives and she pulled me off.

My options were then given to me: Tysabri or Chemo.... and the doc was very strongly against chemo.

So far (3 infusions, next one scheduled for next week), I have no side effects other than feeling drained of energy the day of the infusion. No night sweats, fever, rashes, flu like sx... so for that I am happy. BUT, the latest MRI shows I have grown more lesions and a few of the new ones are active. I have not seen an improvement in any sx so far, but again I have only done 3 infusions.

In any decision you make, I wish you the best of luck.

Harry Z 02-25-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chemar (Post 625432)
harry, please remember that this thread is for those who are using or inquiring about tysabri

you have been asked before to start new thread for comments or critique

Chemar,

Yes, I am aware that this thread is for those who are using or inquiring about Tysabri. But I believe it was Natalie who mentioned the Lancet article and others who wanted to understand what this article possibly meant.

I would have thought that anyone who was considering using Tysabri would want to know what the Lancet article was stating and thus my comments from someone who was involved in MS research. If this was outside the boundaries of the thread, then I do apologize.

Harry


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.