Myasthenia Gravis For support and discussions on Myasthenia Gravis, Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes and LEMS.


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2011, 01:04 PM #1
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Default Question re antibody test

If I understand my reading correctly, there shouldn't be any antibodies against the ACh receptors in a "normal" (i.e. non MG) person - right?

..... so why does my screen panel have 3 classes: negative, equivocal and positive with ranges for each: i.e. negative is .3nmol/L or less, equivocal is 3.1 to .49, and positive is .5 or better (I registered at .3)

Just curious if anyone knows....
Ravenred is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 12-02-2011, 01:05 PM #2
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenred View Post
If I understand my reading correctly, there shouldn't be any antibodies against the ACh receptors in a "normal" (i.e. non MG) person - right?

..... so why does my screen panel have 3 classes: negative, equivocal and positive with ranges for each: i.e. negative is .3nmol/L or less, equivocal is 3.1 to .49, and positive is .5 or better (I registered at .3)

Just curious if anyone knows....
sorry that's .31 to .49
Ravenred is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 01:45 PM #3
Kage12 Kage12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 18
10 yr Member
Kage12 Kage12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 18
10 yr Member
Default

I didn't have the equivocal value on my results, which equivocal would mean they were somehow questionable, so I don't know about that. Each lab has a different scale for the test range. I can tell you that I was "negative" at .4 and 2 months later tested postive at .7. The negative range was <= .4 & positive was .5 or >. I've often wondered why it's negative if you are showing ANY antibodies, ie the .4 or less range.
Kage12 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 07:31 AM #4
alice md's Avatar
alice md alice md is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
alice md alice md is offline
Member
alice md's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
10 yr Member
Default

Every test has what is called a false positive (eg-you get positive results, even if you do not have the illness) and a false negative (eg-you get negative results, even if you do have the illness).

The limits of the test are chosen so that there is an optimal true positive and true negative rate. Those can be slightly different for each lab, based on the equipment and reagents that are being used.

Many times there is a also a gray zone, in which the chance of a true positive is too high to be ignored, yet too low to be conclusive. Some labs will just cut it into one of the categories, and others will report it as equivocal.

We all have a very low level of various antibodies (some which are auto-reactive) that mostly have no clinical significance. This is why there is a certain cut off that has to be used to differentiate between such a non-specific response and a true positive test.

Those are again different according to the specific test and the specific lab performing it.

In deciding if a test is truly positive (or truly negative) one has to incorporate the clinical picture with the results of the test.
alice md is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 08:27 PM #5
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Ravenred Ravenred is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 31
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alice md View Post
Every test has what is called a false positive (eg-you get positive results, even if you do not have the illness) and a false negative (eg-you get negative results, even if you do have the illness).

The limits of the test are chosen so that there is an optimal true positive and true negative rate. Those can be slightly different for each lab, based on the equipment and reagents that are being used.

Many times there is a also a gray zone, in which the chance of a true positive is too high to be ignored, yet too low to be conclusive. Some labs will just cut it into one of the categories, and others will report it as equivocal.

We all have a very low level of various antibodies (some which are auto-reactive) that mostly have no clinical significance. This is why there is a certain cut off that has to be used to differentiate between such a non-specific response and a true positive test.

Those are again different according to the specific test and the specific lab performing it.

In deciding if a test is truly positive (or truly negative) one has to incorporate the clinical picture with the results of the test.



Thanks Anne - sort of why they call it "practicing" medicine - a learn as you go.....
Ravenred is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question re: Mistake with EMG Test axseptants Peripheral Neuropathy 6 05-06-2011 07:02 AM
Question about ACH Blood Test pingpongman Myasthenia Gravis 16 09-30-2010 03:08 PM
question about the ice pack test AliceH Myasthenia Gravis 13 04-20-2009 11:51 AM
Blood Test Question mistiis Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 3 10-21-2008 11:11 PM
Test question turner Gluten Sensitivity / Celiac Disease 16 07-17-2007 09:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.