FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
03-05-2010, 03:49 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Member
|
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/EmergencyPr.../ucm134147.htm
Thought some of you may find this interesting. (and the rest of you already know it )
__________________
_________________________________________________ http://calipso-pd.org ...bringing a new wave of Parkinson’s support to central Illinois |
|||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | lindylanka (03-05-2010), paula_w (03-05-2010) |
03-05-2010, 06:48 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I can't believe the FDA put this out, this is NOT our experience at all! Generics are NOT the same and they DO NOT work the same in the body, any pharmacist will tell you that the different fillers, etc. used can greatly alter how quickly or slowly the active ingredient is absorbed by the body. If what this propaganda says were really true, EVERYONE would be on the generics, which we all know, they are not.
We personally can take some generics, but not others. Even our neuro told us this up front, and we have to try the generic form first and go through all of the nauseau, headaches, worse PD symptoms of the generic trial and only then, if it totally doesn't work, can we get name brand. Even then, our neuro has to fight with the insurance company to get us the name brand every time the script is up (now every six months, instead of once a year). It's sad our own government is putting out this $#!, I guess we should brace for even more name brands to become virtually unavailable (not on any formulary) as the government tries to migrate more and more of us onto the cheaper generics. |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | lindylanka (03-05-2010), vlhperry (03-05-2010) |
03-05-2010, 10:59 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Generic Sinemet doesnt work for me
__________________
There are those who see things as they are and ask..Why?..I dream of things that never were and ask..Why not?..RFK |
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-05-2010, 11:04 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Member aka Dianna Wood
|
"Colors, flavors, and certain other inactive ingredients may be different.
Are people allergic to food dyes? Maybe the filler is ash, Taurine, or crude fiber? (cat food fillers.) If a patient happen to be taking 5 or more drugs, could some of these unactive ingrediants be enough to make a patient sick? Could they cause bad reactions in patients? The FDA only monitors the active ingrediants. *political comment removed* Last edited by Chemar; 03-06-2010 at 08:45 AM. Reason: NT guidelines on politics |
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-05-2010, 11:54 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
since I moved to Canad recently and can't see a difference
Imad |
||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2010, 04:51 AM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Science News
Education / Articles / Are Generic Drugs as Effective as Brand ... Are Generic Drugs as Effective as Brand Name? - Not Always! A number of patients with a history of good results on brand name antibiotics began experiencing difficulties when a generic was substituted. Therefore, if you have prescribed a brand name tetracycline for a patient using antibiotic therapy and have not specified d.a.w. or no substitutions, your patient is probably taking a generic version and may be having a less than significant response to the treatment. Some generic versions have been found to be ineffective for this treatment. In order to market drugs, U.S. generic manufacturers must have a permit and approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicating that the active ingredient is approximately the same as that of the brand name. The determination of drug approval is made according to whether it is pharmaceutically equivalent, bio-available, and bioequivalent. Pharmaceutically Equivalent Two drugs are considered pharmaceutical equivalents when they contain the same chemically active ingredient(s) and are identical in dosage form and strength. Tetracyclines such as minocycline are complex with many properties that may play an important part in treatment response in the arthritic patient. The fact that patients in remission (sometimes for years) while on antibiotic therapy saw a gradual return of symptoms when switched to a generic alerted us to a potential problem with some generics. In three test patients, these symptoms began to reverse immediately upon a return to the brand name version of the drug. Pharmaceutical equivalence may be affected by many things. 1) variations in inert ingredients 2) plants in different parts of the world may produce ingredients that vary in quality, and by batch and manufacturing methods. Until recently, 80% of drug ingredients came from plants in Western Europe. According to a NY Times article April 11, 1996, that is changing. Many ingredients are now being used from plants in China, Japan, South Korea, India and Eastern Europe where they are produced more cheaply. Bob Milanese, president of the National Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, indicates that only a handful of these plants meet FDA standards. "Some others are questionable" due to the difficulty in finding people and budget to "get over and inspect these plants." Another factor which affects generic quality cited by the same article is the international buy outs and diversification allowing the combination of questionable ingredients into generic production. 3) In oral drugs, capsule content may be 7% over or 7% under the stated content, e.g. a 100 mg. capsule may be as low as 93 mg. or as high as 107 mg. 4) Manufacturers may shift their source of supply. 5) Once a drug has been approved by the FDA, manufacturers sometimes make changes to the formula which was originally submitted. 6) Many arthritic patients are elderly. The age of the patient may be a factor in pharmacokinetics. Digestive tract absorption of an oral drug may be altered by a variety of factors, including higher gastric pH, accelerated gastric emptying, and thinning and reduction of the absorptive surface. Bioavailability may be influenced by the increase (or decrease) in percent of body fat which is common in some with age. It may be even higher in sedentary persons (or persons in pain who are inactive in order to minimize discomfort.) This increased fat to lean ratio results in a reservoir for lipid-soluble drugs which is larger allowing those drugs to stay in the body longer, increasing the possibility of drug sensitivity by prolonging the half-life. Conversely, total water content declines with age. This decline allows a decreased volume of distribution for water-soluble drugs. In addition to general approval, the FDA rates drugs with codes. All drugs with an "A" code are rated as being therapeutically equivalent; "B" coded drugs are those not rated equivalent Some pharmacies fill with B-rated drugs. At this time, it is recommended that no patient use a version of a drug with a B-rating. Clinical differences or serious bioequivalence problems with B-rated products have been reported for drugs such as prednisone, estrogen tablets, levodopa and phenytoin. In addition to The Orange Book, The Physician's Generix lists available generics as therapeutically equivalent or non-equivalent. Because the antibiotic protocol uses such low doses, leeway between versions which are effective and those which are not may be much more critical. Bioavailability In bioavailability, it can be assumed that the drug's effectiveness is related to the amount of product absorbed and the speed of absorption. However, in some cases, the pharmaceutically equivalent products can have different bioavailability. They may be absorbed either faster or slower than the brand name drug which may or may not be clinically significant. The pH-dissolution profile of a product may have clinical relevance. Even if the coating is adequate to prevent release of the enzymes in the stomach where the ingredients are irreversibly inactivated, it may not dissolve at the pH of the duodenum after meals. Bioequivalence In bioequivalence studies, the goal of testing is to determine if the drugs are functionally equivalent. The FDA requires that any approved drug be effective within a 20% range of the original patented or brand name drug. This means that the effectiveness may be 20% greater or 20% less effective than the brand name so that two generic drugs could contain as much as a 40% difference from each other. Therefore, a drug may be legally chemically equivalent but not at the same time clinically equivalent. A study run on a generic of the anti-seizure, Tegretol, found the generic allowed breakthrough seizures. An example of how the above factors may affect the bioavailability and clinical effectiveness is seen by applying these factors to tetracycline. At one extreme, a 500 mg. dose of tetracycline taken in 2-250 mg. capsules which is 20% lower in effectiveness, 7% low in the mg. amount in each capsule (14% dose total) and which is taken with food, decreasing the absorption rate (<50%), could provide as low as 136 mg of tetracycline that is available to the body. Correspondingly, the same 2-250 mg. capsules making a total dose of 500 mg. which is 20% more effective, 7% over on mg. in capsule and taken without food (increasing the absorption rate to 77%), provides 555 mg that is functionally available to the system. It should be noted the food-drug interaction is less a factor with minocycline and doxycycline as they are absorbed differently. In addition to the ±20% difference allowed in bioavailability by the FDA and the ±7% of the stated capsule content allowed by the U.S. Pharmacopoeia, there are other considerations which should be considered when using a generic drug. 1) Some drugs lose potency while on the shelf, so drug companies increase the strength so as the drug ages, it will still provide a therapeutic level. This means patients who use the drug soon after production when the dose may be stronger may be getting an overdose. 2) There is a risk that a generic substitution could result in a change in serum concentration 3) Such a change may lead to signifi-cant adverse effects or loss of benefit 4) The risk that patients may receive different generics each time they fill their prescription, changing the response to the drug. 5) Cost of brand names is usually, but not always, higher than for a generic. 6) Blood tests can become necessary to determine adequate concentrations, excessive, possibly toxic concentrations or low, possibly ineffective concentra-tions 7) The cost of the time and effort spent in adjusting the dose (if needed) Bioequivalence may be effected by the type of study; e.g. two brand name pharmaceutical equivalents were each compared with a placebo in separate trials but were not compared with each other for bioequivalence. Thus while each was effective, it cannot be assumed that they produce the same clinical effect. Bioequivalence studies are performed on healthy volunteers and thus may not account for the full pharmacologic and therapeutic impact of generic substitution on patients with disease. Conclusion A pharmacist may legally fill a prescription in the United States with either the brand name or a generic without consulting either the patient or the physician. A prescription may not even be filled consistently with the same generic. To assure continuity for the patient, the physician should indicate on the prescription no substitutions or dispense as written (daw). The purpose of this article is not to condemn generic drugs for many are as effective as the brand name and even come from the same manufacturing company, but are repackaged and sold by another company as their own generic brand. Our purpose is, however, to provide a warning not to assume that all drugs with the same generic title are equal and will have the same clinical effect, even though many drug reps say they are equal. This is particularly true of the tetracycline family because it is one of the oldest families of antibiotics being first patented in 1953. Since a patent is good for 17 years, the original tetracycline has been available for generic reproduction for some 25 years. References: Brooke PA, Resistant Prices, A study of competitive strains in the antibiotic markets, 1976, Ballinger Pub. Hendeles L, Hochhaus G, Kazerounian S, Generic and alternative brand-name pharmaceutical equivalents: Select with caution, Am J Hosp Pharm, 1993; 50:2, 323-329. Medical Information Department, Lederle Labs, telephone conversations. Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Jr., Bennett JE, Principals and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Wiley Medical Pub, 1985. Mikati M, Bassett N, Schachter S, Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy, Epilepsia, 1992; 33:2, 359-364. Oles KS, Penry JK, Smith LD, Anderson RL, Dean, JC, Riela AR, Therapeutic bioequivalency study of brand name versus generic carbamazepine, Neurology, 1992, 42:6, 1147-52. Physician's Generix?, Data Pharmaceutica, 1996. Reinstein PH, Regulatory status of pancreatic enzyme preparations, JAMA, 1990; 263:18, 2491-2492. Stoughton RB, Are generic formulations equivalent to trade name topical glucocorticoids? Arch Derm, 1987; 123:9, 1312-1314. Univ. of Chicago Drug Information, telephone conversation. For insurance companies who will not cover brand name drugs when a generic is available, a blood test to determine concentration may be necessary for those using low dose antibiotics to provide data to require payment for the brand name drug. To assure continuity for the patient, the physician should indicate on the prescription no substitutions or dispense as written (daw). The Road Back Foundation: Educational Use Permitted Home | About RBF | Community | Education | Studies | Donate |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | Conductor71 (03-06-2010), imark3000 (03-06-2010) |
03-06-2010, 07:38 AM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Thanks Giriija,
This is an amazing article and explains a lot. It is interesting that levodopa is specifically mentioned. It also explains why PwP have problems with changes too and from generics. If dosage and absorbtion can vary to that degree, and we are dose sensitive, these kind of variations could sent us out either way, too little or too much, without us being aware of it. Thanks you so much for posting this. Lindy |
||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2010, 09:10 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Member
|
My neuro said the same thing, especially for medication for epilepsy. I tried brand Sinemet last month and just got my refill as a generic. So far I've noticed no difference. Then again I haven't really found that much relief anyway.
Thanks for the great article Giriija.
__________________
_________________________________________________ http://calipso-pd.org ...bringing a new wave of Parkinson’s support to central Illinois |
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2010, 10:54 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Thank you so much. I really think this should go up with the stickies and that all need to print this and keep it on file to show any doctor when discussing prescriptions. My questions...if we are on a generic form of Sinemet, how do we find what exactly it is? Can we look up these equivalency ratings on the FDA website? Do we have a right to demand that our pharmacist maintain the same generic brand? Laura |
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2010, 06:07 PM | #10 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Laura,
I asked for both composition and equivalency info of Percopa and Carbidopa from the company that sells these drugs. They were supposed to mail that info two weeks ago, I have not received it yet! FDA site is a good idea, i will check it out, I dont remember where I read this, but its in my memory! I dont believe we have any "rights" to ask for the same generic brand as the FDA thinks they are all the same. I wrote to FDA asking for publications or studies that compared name brand vs generics for a few selected drugs including Sinemet, Mirapex and what their protocols are for approving generics.........I will let you know if I hear from them. FDA needs to hire a few patients as their staff! girija |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The generic drug myth | Parkinson's Disease | |||
FDA To Strengthen Generic Drug Program...Streamline Generic Drug Approval Process | Parkinson's Disease |