FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
04-27-2010, 04:42 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03...e_for_life.pdf
bioscience for life:Who decides what research is done in health and agriculture? Helen Wallace This report is an investigation of the shaping of science, innovation and the economy in the UK and Europe. Looking at the biological sciences in the context of both health and agriculture, it: · Describes the adoption of the idea of the 'knowledge-based economy' (KBE) as the key driver for future economic growth and competitiveness. How do policy commitments to the KBE in Britain and Europe influence research priorities? What is the role of the biosciences and biotechnology in the knowledge-based economy? · Considers whether and how universities and research institutes reinforce certain research trajectories. What encouragement is there for scientists to take a certain path and how do their aspirations affect the process? Are there mechanisms which reinforce central tendencies to follow a certain path and to exclude the public? · Describes how research priorities are set. The report considers the way in which the new European Framework 7 research program was established and how the Medical Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Research Council set their priorities in the UK, including the role of government policies. · Documents the membership of science policy advisory committees and boards. To demonstrate who is having influence, and where and how conflicts of interest may arise, the report examines who is involved in formal consultations and the extent of any public engagement exercises. The report examines the extent to which the research agenda is skewed towards attempting to create economic growth in particular commercial sectors, particularly those investing in research and development in the biosciences and biotechnology. It describes how two particular visions of how the biosciences will contribute to both growth and human welfare have been developed and promoted: the idea that everyone will have their own genome sequenced, leading to 'personalised medicine'; and the idea that genetically modified (GM) crops will be developed which improve nutrition, benefit the environment and create a new plant-based system for the manufacture of biofuels, chemicals and pharmaceuticals. It also considers whether the research funding system leads to important areas of research being neglected that could contribute to better health and more sustainable agriculture. Finally, the report questions whether the current system of setting research priorities is sufficiently open, transparent and democratic. Ways of improving the system are suggested so that more people have a say about what research is done, with the aim of developing a research agenda that better reflects the needs of people and the environment.
__________________
In the last analysis, we see only what we are ready to see, what we have been taught to see. We eliminate and ignore everything that is not a part of our prejudices. ~ Jean-Martin Charcot The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed. William Gibson |
|||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | Conductor71 (04-28-2010), RLSmi (04-27-2010) |
Reply |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how to really control healthcare costs: go to the Agriculture Committees | Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD and CRPS) | |||
how to really control healthcare costs: go to the Agriculture Committees | Weight Loss & Healthy Living |