Parkinson's Disease Tulip


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2013, 12:42 PM #11
ashleyk ashleyk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 262
15 yr Member
ashleyk ashleyk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 262
15 yr Member
Default Leukemia PD patient?

Here's an obvious question. I assume there are people with PD who have come down with this type leukemia and have been treated with this drug.
Hopefully, their leukemia was put into remission but what happened with their PD? Did they see any improvements? Is anyone asking?
ashleyk is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
lab rat (05-13-2013), soccertese (05-12-2013)

advertisement
Old 05-13-2013, 10:11 AM #12
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleyk View Post
Here's an obvious question. I assume there are people with PD who have come down with this type leukemia and have been treated with this drug.
Hopefully, their leukemia was put into remission but what happened with their PD? Did they see any improvements? Is anyone asking?

ashleyk, I think that's a great question. I would guess that given the population of PWP that have also taken nilotinib is not that high. CML in general is not that common (1 in 625 lifetime chance of occurence). Also, the drug has only been on the market for about 5 years and is only used for a subset of CML patients. Nevertheless, there must be some PWP that can be found that can at least provide some anecdotal information about the drug.

I think the biggest problem is that the information may not be that useful. First, the researchers are suggesting testing nilotinib on early stage patients. Therefore, you would have to narrow down the subset population even more to just those PWP who were recently diagnosed. More important, though, I believe is the dosing issue. When used for CML, the drug is given in very high dosages in order to cause cell autophagy. Essentially, kill the cancer cells. The opposite was done in this neurological research. Their theory was to use the drug in extemely low dosage in order to keep cells alive by ridding them of an excess of garbage a-syn.

What we really need right now is for the manufacturer, Novartis, to open up their pocketbook and fully support the funding of this new research. Given their ability to put this right into Phase 2, they should be able to move it along quicker than two university doctors at Georgetown U by themselves.

Last edited by Tupelo3; 05-13-2013 at 10:57 AM.
Tupelo3 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
soccertese (05-13-2013)
Old 05-15-2013, 01:55 AM #13
lab rat lab rat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 108
10 yr Member
lab rat lab rat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 108
10 yr Member
Default Is an inexpensive, small, open label trial in order ?

I keep thinking research of already approved drugs in MUCH LOWER DOSES might be carried out in small open label trials.

Patient funded ?? Kickstart funded ? Part patient funding with matching funds from MJFF ??

I, for one, am willing to make a significant donation.
lab rat is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
soccertese (05-15-2013), Tupelo3 (05-15-2013)
Old 05-15-2013, 04:28 AM #14
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lab rat View Post
I keep thinking research of already approved drugs in MUCH LOWER DOSES might be carried out in small open label trials.

Patient funded ?? Kickstart funded ? Part patient funding with matching funds from MJFF ??

I, for one, am willing to make a significant donation.
i'd contact the researcher, nothing to lose. find out how serious he is about a phase2 study and if he would consider crowd funding. we can't keep waiting years to find out if a cere-120 might help imho, something has to change in their experimental designs imho. i hope that cere-120 failure would have stimulated more public discussion, it doesn't seemed to have. hardly a peep.
soccertese is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
lab rat (05-16-2013), Tupelo3 (05-15-2013)
Old 05-15-2013, 06:55 AM #15
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by soccertese View Post
i'd contact the researcher, nothing to lose. find out how serious he is about a phase2 study and if he would consider crowd funding. .
That's an interesting suggestion. I think I'll try to do it.
Tupelo3 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 05-15-2013, 08:28 AM #16
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
soccertese soccertese is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,531
15 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tupelo3 View Post
That's an interesting suggestion. I think I'll try to do it.
gulp, good luck. contacting pd researchers who have publicized great results with mice can be a full time job.
soccertese is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-07-2013, 09:47 AM #17
rickanderson1942 rickanderson1942 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
10 yr Member
rickanderson1942 rickanderson1942 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
10 yr Member
Default

I would lke very much to participate in your funded clinical trial. Athough w/o placebos!

Rick Anderson
rickanderson1942 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protein build-up leads to neurons misfiring soccertese Parkinson's Disease 0 07-18-2012 12:35 PM
Another study on toxic amyloid build-up VICTORIALOU Parkinson's Disease 0 08-20-2011 09:19 AM
Three Brain Diseases Linked By Toxic Form Of Same Neural Protein Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 0 02-03-2010 11:14 AM
How brain amyloid protein turns toxic in Alzheimer's disease Stitcher Parkinson's Disease 0 01-21-2007 04:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.