Parkinson's Disease Tulip


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2013, 03:17 PM #1
GerryW's Avatar
GerryW GerryW is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 613
10 yr Member
GerryW GerryW is offline
Member
GerryW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 613
10 yr Member
Default stem cell therapy clinics

Stem cells have been discussed many times on this forum but I remain confused about a contradiction. On the one hand I see ads for stem cell therapy from what appear to be reputable American or European clinics staffed by medical doctors. They all promise good results with PD and many have the usual glowing testimonials. The commonest treatment appears to be cells taken from adipose (fat) tissue.

On the other hand the official view is that stem cell therapy is not ready for prime time yet and researchers are still working with it. I even found an interview with Michael J Fox saying he didn't expect results any time soon with stem cells and that drugs were more promising.

What am I missing? I could speculate about the reasons for this disparity. The clinics are lying or exaggerating, something that doesn't seem possible over the long run. The researchers could just be talking out their particular method which hasn't been perfected yet. I really don't know.

Has anyone attended any of these clinics and what was your experience?
GerryW is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 10-29-2013, 02:15 PM #2
Stand Tall Stand Tall is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 139
10 yr Member
Stand Tall Stand Tall is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 139
10 yr Member
Default MJFF Podcast

https://www.michaeljfox.org/foundati...-to-stem-cells
Stand Tall is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
GerryW (11-09-2013), VICTORIALOU (10-29-2013)
Old 11-04-2013, 07:10 PM #3
aftermathman aftermathman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Evesham, England
Posts: 598
15 yr Member
aftermathman aftermathman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Evesham, England
Posts: 598
15 yr Member
Default You have hit the nail on the head ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GerryW View Post
Stem cells have been discussed many times on this forum but I remain confused about a contradiction. On the one hand I see ads for stem cell therapy from what appear to be reputable American or European clinics staffed by medical doctors. They all promise good results with PD and many have the usual glowing testimonials. The commonest treatment appears to be cells taken from adipose (fat) tissue.

On the other hand the official view is that stem cell therapy is not ready for prime time yet and researchers are still working with it. I even found an interview with Michael J Fox saying he didn't expect results any time soon with stem cells and that drugs were more promising.

What am I missing? I could speculate about the reasons for this disparity. The clinics are lying or exaggerating, something that doesn't seem possible over the long run. The researchers could just be talking out their particular method which hasn't been perfected yet. I really don't know.

Has anyone attended any of these clinics and what was your experience?
the problem with these clinics is that none have provided credible people with objective results from treatment.

The lack of any response to your post supports this belief that the"the clinics" are not yet ready for prime time.

Neil.
aftermathman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
GerryW (11-09-2013), soccertese (11-05-2013)
Old 11-09-2013, 02:44 AM #4
ol'cs ol'cs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
15 yr Member
ol'cs ol'cs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
15 yr Member
Default Gerry and all

The stem cello "clinics", have nothing as of yet. They recently changed their tune on PD treatment, from an "peripheral injectable" form to an actual " brain opened implant" by transplanting ( so they say) " stem cells " (of a dubious nature) through a n invasive surgery, supposedly into the Substantia Nigra .
The claims for stem cell lines have been blurred and contorted in order to fill the as yet unrealized promise for neural net replacement. It has been extremely difficult to develop working, dependable cell types for the extremely complicated and sensitive task of brain regeneration, especially without making regulatory agencies in our country balk at their inclusion into the realm of approving " safe and effective" cell lines of ethically exempted nature. It really has been a long road fraught with difficulties to invent " the real thing" which will do the job that needs to be done. So many technical considerations still need work! However, I will take heart till my last breath that there still may be a way, soon, I hope!
ol'cs is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
carruthers209 (11-10-2013), GerryW (11-09-2013)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stem cell therapy now? pegleg Parkinson's Disease 4 07-07-2010 07:37 AM
stem cell therapy Traceeg Cerebral Palsy 1 01-11-2010 02:17 AM
Stem Cell Therapy mitch98 Stroke 0 01-22-2009 09:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.