Parkinson's Disease Tulip


advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2015, 12:22 AM #1
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
Default Interesting Alzheimer's Study (mice)

http://www.sciencealert.com/new-alzh...emory-function
anagirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
GerryW (07-02-2015), lab rat (07-02-2015), wxxu (07-02-2015)

advertisement
Old 07-02-2015, 07:38 AM #2
lurkingforacure lurkingforacure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,485
15 yr Member
lurkingforacure lurkingforacure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,485
15 yr Member
Default why so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by anagirl View Post
This sounds so promising, but why do they have to wait until 2017 to do more work on this? And on animals? I could see it taking awhile to prepare for a trial on humans, but not sheep or primates. It's so frustrating to read of promising treatments that could be real game-changers, but have such a long time-to-market that it may not come in time for us. We don't have Alz., but this is another example of the pace of research being far too slow.
lurkingforacure is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
johnt (07-02-2015)
Old 07-02-2015, 01:01 PM #3
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Tupelo3 Tupelo3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 832
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkingforacure View Post
This sounds so promising, but why do they have to wait until 2017 to do more work on this? And on animals? I could see it taking awhile to prepare for a trial on humans, but not sheep or primates. It's so frustrating to read of promising treatments that could be real game-changers, but have such a long time-to-market that it may not come in time for us. We don't have Alz., but this is another example of the pace of research being far too slow.
I believe the higher level animal research will begin soon. It's the human trials that are scheduled for 2017.
Tupelo3 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
wxxu (07-02-2015)
Old 07-02-2015, 06:01 PM #4
johnt johnt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stafford, UK
Posts: 1,059
15 yr Member
johnt johnt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stafford, UK
Posts: 1,059
15 yr Member
Default

I agree with lurkingforacure. I don't see a sense of urgency. It seems to me that if we were properly organized we could have this sort of work completed in weeks, not years. Of course, the outcome might not be successful, but we could assess potential therapies much quicker. I think it was Conductor71 who contrasted the war on Parkinson's with the building of the first atomic bomb, which was designed, built and used in 6 years.

Scaling up could be a problem: the ultrasound waves will have to travel about 10 times further in a human than for a mouse.

John
__________________
Born 1955. Diagnosed PD 2005.
Meds 2010-Nov 2016: Stalevo(75 mg) x 4, ropinirole xl 16 mg, rasagiline 1 mg
Current meds: Stalevo(75 mg) x 5, ropinirole xl 8 mg, rasagiline 1 mg
johnt is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 07-03-2015, 08:52 PM #5
olsen's Avatar
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
olsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
Default initial response to article

is that if the therapy is not very expensive or does not involve very complicated delivery (ie brain surgery to implant electrodes or catheters) studies will go nowhere. Unless MJF is involved. And what has ever happened to Andy Grove?
__________________
In the last analysis, we see only what we are ready to see, what we have been taught to see. We eliminate and ignore everything that is not a part of our prejudices.

~ Jean-Martin Charcot


The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed. William Gibson
olsen is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
lab rat (07-03-2015)
Old 07-05-2015, 07:45 AM #6
olsen's Avatar
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
olsen olsen is offline
Senior Member
olsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,860
15 yr Member
Default Ahh, guess I should have researched this first...

Quote:
Originally Posted by olsen View Post
is that if the therapy is not very expensive or does not involve very complicated delivery (ie brain surgery to implant electrodes or catheters) studies will go nowhere. Unless MJF is involved. And what has ever happened to Andy Grove?

http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/ho...nd-urgent.html
__________________
In the last analysis, we see only what we are ready to see, what we have been taught to see. We eliminate and ignore everything that is not a part of our prejudices.

~ Jean-Martin Charcot


The future is already here — it's just not very evenly distributed. William Gibson
olsen is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 10:07 PM #7
zanpar321 zanpar321 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 365
10 yr Member
zanpar321 zanpar321 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 365
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anagirl View Post
Human trials using ultrasound for Parkinson's! Now recruiting

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/...son%27s&rank=1
zanpar321 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
anagirl (07-05-2015), lab rat (07-06-2015)
Old 07-05-2015, 11:02 PM #8
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
anagirl anagirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 199
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zanpar321 View Post
Human trials using ultrasound for Parkinson's! Now recruiting

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/...son%27s&rank=1

Oh wow! Interesting! I would totally try to get into that study if I lived closed by. Thank you for posting. This will be one to follow.
anagirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.