This is a profound issue with its current application. Many of the 'providers' of the protocol are extremely lacking in clinical experience of its application, and just an overall fundamental understanding of the underlying biology at play and how to properly maneuver a patient based on their independent response. The current system of education is essentially go to one of Dr. Hinz's conferences, then get in contact with his associated companies to get the products needed and test kits.

So you essentially have a lot of 'doctors' (many chiros, etc who often have no business claiming expertise on such a dynamic modality) that begin treating patients without really any fundamental understanding of what they are doing. This leads to patients getting poor results, and directly impacts the integrity of the actual incredibly progressive science beneath it.

Dr. Hinz consults with physicians 6 hours a day 4 days a week. Even if there were only 50 practitioners applying this science, there is no way for Dr. Hinz to be able to scale his ability to educate these people on how to actually apply it.

Another issue is that many of these Doctor's ego's get in the way. They go to one medical conference, oversimplify it in their head, and then don't seek out further understanding education of it because of their shortsightedness.

In my estimation, there is probably less than 50 doctor's (but i wouldn't even be surprised if there is less than 20 or 10) that truly understand how to properly manipulate L-dopa, 5-htp, L-cysteine, L-Tyrosine, and co-factors as described by Hinz in an effective sustainable fashion that actually gets the desired result for the patient which is essentially increasing the electrical output of the remaining viable neuronal structures to a degree that makes up for the deficit from the dead ones.

Who were the 2 doctors you worked with? I could do a little research into their websites if they have them to get a better idea as to what their competency is with this methodology.

Also, one other thing I wanted to mention is that there are probably (i'm not sure of specifics) less than 1000 patients who have been treated under the Hinz methodology. The amount of these patients who have been treated correctly is probably less than 500.

These patients who have had success generally will not be the types to frequent forums as why would they? People that are well don't spend their time on forums, they spend it living their life.

So the issue with there not being a ton of personal case studies available on the internet is there is a relatively low N of patients who have been treated by it, combined with many of these patients being mismanaged, combined with patients who do get good results and their life back aren't going to have any reason to go searching for information and support in these types of forums.