Tupelo3, I've read your response several times, but I just can't see how you came to understand my post in that way. I'll try to say the same thing once again, but this time in a different way.
From reference [4]: "While the activity of c-Abl is crucial for proper neuronal development, it appears that c-Abl remains relatively quiescent in healthy adult neurons, and there are few known functions of c-Abl in fully differentiated neurons. In recent years, it has been shown that activation of c-Abl in adult brain occurs in the context of human neurodegenerative disease." From reference [2]: "c-Abl is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that is activated by oxidative and cellular stress" Just from these two statements, it could be hypothesized that the inhibition of c-Abl might be a worthwhile thing to try. I have simply outlined three different ways by which the inhibition of c-Abl might (hypothetically) result in protection of dopamine neurons. Granted, hypotheses 1 & 3 have my name on them, but in each case I have only contributed the bit which says that c-Abl prevents Parkin from performing its normal function. The rest of hypothesis 1 and hypothesis 3 is straight from reference [1] and reference [3] respectively. [1] Matheoud et al. (2016) Parkinson’s Disease-Related Proteins PINK1 and Parkin Repress Mitochondrial Antigen Presentation, Cell 166, 314–327, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.039. [2] Brahmachari et al. (2016) Activation of tyrosine kinase c-Abl contributes to α-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration, J Clin Invest. doi: 10.1172/JCI85456. [3] Yunjong et al. (2016) PINK1 Primes Parkin-Mediated Ubiquitination of PARIS in Dopaminergic Neuronal Survival, Cell Reports Volume 18, Issue 4, p918–932, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.090. [4] Schlatterer et al. (2011) c-Abl in Neurodegenerative Disease, J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Nov; 45(3): 445–452, doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9588-1. |
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
|
Quote:
|
Tupelo3 said: "I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree."
Okay, let's do that for now. It concerns me though, that I find myself disagreeing with you. I shall spend some time trying to deepen my understanding of this area. |
Quote:
This whole thing was probably just a difference in semantic interpretation. Nevertheless, I would be happy to discuss this with you more off-line at anytime so we can educate each other ;) Gary |
germ proof
I, too, seem to be germ proof. I haven't had a cold in years since being diagnosed and don't catch them even when everyone around me has a cold or flu.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by
vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.