wow
 

wow! i'm new here and you guys are all so cool!

thank you all for your astute and meaningful remarks.

i am better for reading them.

best wishes and namaste,

louise

dear louisek -
 

dear one,
yes - I hoped to have been, way cool? hahaha!
but I am still after over 20 years with the PD tremor etc. finally dxd after hunting for years, going from one neuro to the next or anyone that could explain to me why a 28 year old women would shake?
:)
and I still feel PD was caused by hypoglycemia/ low blood sugar/ and brain damage... *lightbulb

and
dear rev?
keep on going - were very close in our study of PD - to the why and how?
peace to your heart...

Thank you lou_lou. I shall continue you onward.

Regarding the "cause", glucose problems may indeed be a part. But I am coming to believe more and more that the "real" cause is the loss or lack of the ability to repair damage that, itself, comes from a dozen possible sources.

Whether that failure results from Vitamin D issues (my hypothesis du jour) or some other point, it is this type of explanation that makes the most sense. It explains how we are each so different (multiple sources of damage) and yet so similar (a common point of failure of repair capabilities).

The Amgen fiasco did nothing to unmask the causes and went straight to the repair system failures. Possibly curing a number of projected income streams. Not just PD,but AD, MS, etc. Further, if Vit D has a similar effect, there are purportedly a dozen cancers there too. If your corporate plans are based on a longterm relationship with all those customers, a cure is not good news. And if one of your researchers has pointed out that Vit D has a similar effect...