[lou_lou]

Pasteur vs. Beauchamp -

The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.”
quote by -Antoine Beauchamp, 1883

As is often the case one man had a lot more support than the other at this time and this man was Louis Pasteur. His theory seemed to fit, people didn’t need to take responsibility for their own health any longer and the solution seemed easy enough to rectify, plus it would improve the economics of the country and provide thousands with new careers in the manufacturing, marketing, production and promotion of pharmaceuticals.

Have you ever wondered why only a few people get a cold after coming in contact with someone that already has one?

If Pasteur’s theory was right surely we would all ‘catch’ a cold with no exception?

On his death bed Pasteur is in fact reported to have admitted that Beauchamp’s theory was right and that all disease starts with the condition of the body.

For those of you that are interested there is much more information about the history of medicine and recommended books at

http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/terrai...f_medicine.htm

So this is not a way to blame one person for the state of our current thoughts on health, however once we open our eyes to the bigger picture we see there were perhaps more important agendas than our country’s health at the time these two scientists came head to head.

I fully support Beauchamp’s theory and believe entirely that our body’s internal environment will ultimately determine our health…no matter whom or what we are exposed to.

Stay tuned for a link on ways we can change our internal environment to maximise our chances at a full and energetic life. A great book for concepts on inner terrain for you and your family is ‘Sick and Tired’ by Dr Young.

http://www.amazon.com/Sick-Tired-Rec.../dp/1580540562

May this post challenge, inspire and excite you.
If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat—diseased tissue—rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue; e.g., mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant. Rudolph Virchow (Father of Pathology)

[lurkingforacure]

"The ph Miracle" is also along these lines, the point of that book being that our Western diet (and lifestyle) make our bodies far too out of whack in terms of alkalinity/acidity. The more out of balance we are, the more inviting our physical terrain is for bacteria, disease, etc. So the book focuses on things to eat, and avoid, that will bring the balance closer to what we should be. It includes recipes, also.

[reverett123]

A friend in a professional position to know says Rife was right-
http://www.rense.com/general31/rife.htm

[reverett123]

A sorry tale indeed
http://www.naturalnews.com/008845.html

[paula_w]

This is a summary written by Linda Herman, about a very recent 2008 article about GDNF". We were there this time.

This is a new review article on neurotrophic research (featuring GDNF) by Roger Barker of Cambridge Un, Center for Brain Repair.
"Neurotrophic Factors as a therapeutic target for Parkinson's Disease" was published in Expert Opinion Therapeutic Targets, April 2008.

Begin Linda

Well worth reading the entire article. pp. 441- include a review of Clinical studies, and a discussion of the Amgen phase II GDNF trial controversy. Nothing new really but its good to see this point of view in print, by an objective source, and a recognized expert in the field
Among the issues raised:
--differences in study protocol and delivery may have accounted for differences in phase I and II results
-- its possible threshold for GDNF delivery were not met in phase II and led to a false negative result
--phase II follow up period of 6 months may not have been long enough for significant GDNf effect to be observed
the phase II trial study (Lang et al) has "raised as many questions as it answered"
Barker calls GDNF "historically the most potent and promising agent " and notes that it "remains on the development shelf" due to Amgen's decision that "extends to blocking other groups from investigating recombinant GDNF delivered via other vectors"

The promise and problems with the Neurturin study nd gene delivery are described also
And further research with GDNF is needed, there is still great potential, perhaps in combiination with other treatments but " the significance of the problems that led to the cessation of trial work with gDNF is unclear and may remain so for some time"

end linda

Now what? Before it's settled a decade or more will go by.
paula

[reverett123]

Not to hijack this thread I will start another to ask a question about the GDNF fiasco.

[lou_lou]

I do not care about what the subject is as long as we realize
many have had the cures taken from them in the name of greed ...

like these men such as Otto Warburg - who still has the cure for cancer
I know because it cured my sister who cancer had metasticized to her lymph nodes - and was given 2 years to live only of she took the chemo ?
and she has been cancer free -and she never took the chemo!
First there was Otto Warburg who was awarded the 1931 Nobel Prize for medicine for his describing the metabolism of a cancer cell. He stated that the cell suddenly became anaerobic (without oxygen) and required massive amounts of glucose (sugar) to metabolize in a form that could only be described as fermentation:

"The prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the normal oxygen respiration of body cells by an anaerobic cell respiration." -- Otto Warburg


Scores of other medical visionaries went through hell for simply challenging the medical status quo of day, including such legends as Roentgen and his X-rays, Morton for promoting the 'absurd' idea of anaesthesia, Harvey for his theory of the circulation of blood, and many others in recent decades including: W.F. Koch, Revici, Burzynski, Naessens, Priore, Livingston-Wheeler, and Hoxsey.
I studied Hoxey in great detail - this man cured all kinds of bad cancers!
some people paid the ones that wanted too, and had the means to opay -and some could not pay - he gave it to them free...

[lurkingforacure]

These sound intriguing and are available on the interenet-anyone used one and if so, which one? Did it work? Did its use allow you to reduce meds? Some of the site actually list frequencies for specific conditions, so i wonder...

[Howardh]

great thread....And an eye opener. Will need to come back and read more. As usual Helen Keller eeerrrrr Tena (i'm not sayin ) is on the money.

[lou_lou]

Smile though your heart is aching
Smile even though it’s breaking
When there are clouds in the sky, you’ll get by
If you smile through your fear and sorrow
Smile and maybe tomorrow
You’ll see the sun come shining through for you

Light up your face with gladness
Hide every trace of sadness
Although a tear may be ever so near
That’s the time you must keep on trying

Smile, what's the use of crying?
You'll find that life is still worthwhile
If you just smile

That's the time you must keep on trying
Smile, what's the use of crying?
You'll find that life is still worthwhile
If you just smile

written by
charlie chaplin