| FAQ/Help |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
07-07-2008, 10:10 AM
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
In Remembrance
|
`Public' online spaces don't carry speech, rights
By ANICK JESDANUN 07.07.08, 8:23 AM ET NEW YORK - Rant all you want in a public park. A police officer generally won't eject you for your remarks alone, however unpopular or provocative. Say it on the Internet, and you'll find that free speech and other constitutional rights are anything but guaranteed. Companies in charge of seemingly public spaces online wipe out content that's controversial but otherwise legal. Service providers write their own rules for users worldwide and set foreign policy when they cooperate with regimes like China. They serve as prosecutor, judge and jury in handling disputes behind closed doors. The governmental role that companies play online is taking on greater importance as their services - from online hangouts to virtual repositories of photos and video - become more central to public discourse around the world. It's a fallout of the Internet's market-driven growth, but possible remedies, including government regulation, can be worse than the symptoms. Dutch photographer Maarten Dors met the limits of free speech at Yahoo Inc.'s photo-sharing service, Flickr, when he posted an image of an early-adolescent boy with disheveled hair and a ragged T-shirt, staring blankly with a lit cigarette in his mouth. Without prior notice, Yahoo deleted the photo on grounds it violated an unwritten ban on depicting children smoking. Dors eventually convinced a Yahoo manager that - far from promoting smoking - the photo had value as a statement on poverty and street life in Romania. Yet another employee deleted it again a few months later. "I never thought of it as a photo of a smoking kid," Dors said. "It was just of a kid in Romania and how his life is. You can never make a serious documentary if you always have to think about what Flickr will delete." There may be legitimate reasons to take action, such as to stop spam, security threats, copyright infringement and child pornography, but many cases aren't clear-cut, and balancing competing needs can get thorny. "We often get caught in the middle between a rock and a hard place," said Christine Jones, general counsel with service provider GoDaddy.com Inc. "We're obviously sensitive to the freedoms we have, particularly in this country, to speak our mind, (yet) we want to be good corporate citizens and make the Internet a better and safer place." In Dors' case, the law is fully with Yahoo. Its terms - Click the link below to read the full story: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/...partner=alerts
__________________
with much love, lou_lou . . by . , on Flickr pd documentary - part 2 and 3 . . Resolve to be tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving, and tolerant with the weak and the wrong. Sometime in your life you will have been all of these. |
|||
|
 Reply With Quote
|
| Reply |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| TAKING THEIR MEDICINES? news from Forbes about $$ Amgen & Merck | Parkinson's Disease | |||
| Parma Consolidation to continue in 2007 -Forbes magazine online | Parkinson's Disease | |||
| MED Schools Warn of Drug Sales Pitches - Forbes | Parkinson's Disease | |||
| Forbes magazine - Amgen's Enemies ? | Parkinson's Disease | |||
| Forbes article - MEDICAL GREMLINS! ie: AMGN | Parkinson's Disease | |||
Forbes -`Public' online spaces don't carry speech, rights
Linear Mode
