Here' my situation: My husband's new neurologist (I went to him because I came across his website stating he specialized in neuropathy) prescribed IVIG. EMG/NCS findings were consistent with severe demyelinating sensory motor neuropathy as seen in CIDP. Necessary blood work was done and neuro prescribed the IVIG. He said the serious risks of stroke, renal failure, and aseptic meningitis were so low, and not to be concerned. IVIG has been just been approved to be done at home. My husband (77 years young, controlled high blood pressure, has Alzheimer's [middle stage],.) And I am now aware that a clinical trial, phase III is underway using IVIG for Alzheimer's)to be completed early 2011. So the IVIG may help the CIDP and or the Alzheimer's. So now there is a ray of sunshine in a realm of darkeness. Because of the deadly possible side affects we go back to our new regular neuro (this our third visit to her) for her advice on the side affects of IVIG. I could feel she was angry that we had the neuopathy testing done elsewhere and she said she wanted further tests - lumbar puncture and nerve biopsy - that could give her a better indication, before she would discuss CIDP and IVIG. I told her that unless the tests would give a conclusive answer I felt they were too invasive. So that visit was a waste of our time. And she just lost a patient. Not because we disagreed but because she was curt, rushed, and unwilling to explain and DISCUSS my concerns. So tomorrow we are going to a third neuro, and I directed the receptionist to inform the neuro that we are coming for his opinion on the safety of IVIG as it pertains to my husband and his medical condition. So I hope that goes well.
So thats my story. I am wondering if the IVIG would be better done in an outpatient hospital setting for the first few times? It was prescribed at home due to the neuro having priviledges at a hospital which is 1 hour 20 minutes away. Neuro says he felt home with the nurse was same as outpatient hospital. And I was wondering if anyone had or knows of anyone that had stroke, renal failure, or aseptic meningitis, from IVIG?
I want my husband to be pain free from his neuropathy, but I don't want to kill him. One minute I am so happy that I could cry with joy, that he could be helped and I am all ready to move forward with the IVIG, and the next minute I am crying with fear and despair because I am scared of doing something that might harm or kill him. I know I have to make a decision soon but I'm really, really scared. thanks for reading and any advice.

I have had IVIG both in home and at an infusion center. Either is fine. At the infusion center, they draw blood everytime, so I feel better monitored. I believe I have had aseptic meningitis from it, but it manifests as a very, very bad headache. In general, I don't have them very often. My kidneys are monitored monthly. During infusion, blood pressure is taken frequently. IVIG dumps a lot of protein into the system. The kidneys have to clear it. If kidney function is impaired prior to IVIG, then there is a higher risk of complications.

I am 57, and have to fight to get IVIG. I have had neuropathy since my mid 40's. I have autoimmune disease. I still have a 16 year old at home. I give thanks every day that I am privileged enough to get IVIG. Yet, I do have to fight to get it paid for. It costs roughly $8000 per infusion.

They are offering you a very expensive option, one that most people have to fight very hard to get.

I have had no major issues with IVIG, but each infusion is different because one gets antibodies from up to 10,000 people. I would hardly characterize IVIG as having 'deadly' side effects.

I am not sure what going to additional neurologists will gain you. No one can predict what the reaction to any treatment will be. IVIG is very, very hard to get. Most insurance companies fight you tooth and nail. Doctors have to substantiate why they are ordering it for you. Even then, many people get denied by insurance.

Unfortunately, there is little certainty in life, and no one can promise anything is risk free, however, IVIG, is certainly one of the safer options, and usually well tolerated. The big drawback is expense.

I would think your husband has more to gain than lose from IVIG.

I am also not sure if your husband will be PAIN FREE from IVIG. It may hold or potentially reverse the neuropathy, if indeed it is inflammatory. They must establish that it is inflammatory, and that is why they test.

I have been told that the lumbar puncture and nerve biopsy were just an indication and not always conclusive. That even if the results of these tests were negative, he could still have CIDP. So why do the tests if his insurance doesn't require them in order for him to be authorized to have IVIG therapy?

I can't say for sure, but, to substantiate continued IVIG, you may need baseline and then tests to show it helps. The other issue is they may want to find out what else is going on with your husband. Since he is 77, some of these tests may be hard on him. I don't know how healthy he is.

I can't say why they want those tests. I did have a lumbar puncture, and a skin biopsy for nerve density, not a sural nerve biopsy, tho, because my neuropathy was suspected to be small fiber. Sural nerve biopsy IS quite invasive, and in fact, is not done much anymore. What kind of biopsy are they talking about, skin biopsy for nerve fiber density, or actually taking a piece of nerve from the sural nerve?? Sural nerve biopsies are falling out of favor, because they do damage the nerve...so, yes, question that.

IVIG is a not a very threatening treatment. IVIG is a blood product. It is antibodies from many people, pooled, and subjected to a 'wash' to make it as safe as possible. I hate to say it is rationed, but, let's just say, it is hard for the docs to make a case to give it and they have to be on the ball to get you to keep it. IVIG, does carry a very minute risk of bloodborne infection.

If I were to go on let's say, Rituxan, then I would be more nervous. That has the capacity to really seriously depress the immune system for months if not years. It can activate the JC virus in very rare cases, and cause PML, a fatal brain condition.

Everything has its downside, but IVIG has the potential to help the Alzheimers for your husband. I don't know how advanced that is, but, gosh, if it would help, that would give him a better quality of life.

Given he has Alzheimers, I would give the IVIG a shot. It isn't approved for that, and the CIDP may in a way, be a blessing, if he can get IVIG...and it helps the Alzheimers, or both.

If you read the side effects of many meds it is scary.

I have had IVIG at home and at the infusion center. I currently have to travel an hour one way to get it, since they won't let me have it at home anymore. My husband has to lose a day of work a month to take me in to the city. He uses vacation time since he saves his sick time for retirement insurance...his job does that. However, he loses 12 vacation days per year for my medical care, and that is tough on him. He will be 60 this year.

Since your husband would likely get a loading dose, which is usually 4 to 5 infusions over a period of time...usually daily to every other day, until the loading doses are given, that is the most likely time he could be sick. Loading doses are not fun. I did get a bad headache and threw up. Once I had a low glomerular filtration rate, but it has been normal lately.

The loading dosees, you may want done in an infusion center if you are nervous about it. Then again, your husband could have to endure the ride home, sick. That is why they opt to give it in home for some people.

Make sure that they infuse slowly, take his BP, pulse and temp during the infusion, and adjust the IV accordingly. Most nurses are knowledgeable about IVIG...(some aren't). Ask the home care provider for a nurse who has given it before. Infusion centers are very experienced with IVIG...so are home infusion services (in general, but always ask.)

As far as getting IVIG for Alzheimers, I am wondering if insurance will cover it despite a positive clinical study? The demand would be so high and IVIG is in limited supply. It makes sense to me since Alzheimer's care is so expensive in the long run, but insurance companies don't usually care about that, because they don't pay for long term care, patients generally do. Most of them exhaust all their assets doing that. You may be lucky on this one, and get the benefit of IVIG for the Alzheimers.

If your husband starts to have any reactions, they will stop the infusion.

Most people that get IVIG, don't have any problems with it.

Oh if a home care nurse does it...make sure the IVIG is room temperature. During one loading dose, they ran it in cold....that made me puke...all over my couch. I felt miserable and got a horrible headache then.

That was my only real bad reaction and I think most of it was do to infusing cold stuff, too fast.

BTW, I do think there has been preliminary evidence that IVIG mitigated Alzheimers.

Thanks for taking the time and responding. The first time I event heard of the word CIDP and IVIG was fourteen days ago. I feel that six years ago when the neuropathy first manifested itself is when more should have been done. We were told that it was a neuropathy and quite often a cause is never found, live with it. So now six years later, when it is chronic, I am upset with myself that we did not have a second and third opinion over these years. I'm wondering why the possibility of GBS/CIDP had never been mentioned. . So this is why I want to be really, really, informed; this is why I sound so distrustful of any one doctor's opinion. Also, I have been told, that doctors often receive a "kick back" when prescribing medications. I don't know this doctor, have only met with him twice and don't want to be cynical, and yet I don't want to be naive.
Fortunately, obtaining IVIG treatment, without having to battle with the insurance company, hasn't been an issue here. So that is something I am being spared. NO ONE, should ever have to fight, for a drug that could help and I'm sorry you had to deal with that. Access to good health care and medicines should not be for some but should be for all.
Anyway, we are going to a third neuro this afternoon for his opinion. It makes me feel better. I appreciate you mentioning that you may have had aseptic meningitis (so sorry that happened to you.) This is something that, from what I have read, can be caused by a fast transfusion rate? And it makes sense that, when someone's brain is already in a weakened condition, the last thing they need is aseptic meningitis, because it could very possibly, cause a more rapid decline to one who is already on that path. And that would be something we do not want to happen. So, now I feel that infusion should be given at a slower rate, in order to take no chances. And this is something I will discuss today during the visit.
Because of prior misdiagnosis, non- diagnosis, and doctors who have made serious mistakes, concerning other issues in regards to the both of us, etc. I just have to gain all the knowledge I can in order to feel comfortable in making any medical decisions.

Thanks again, for your reply.