advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2011, 12:03 AM #11
invisable invisable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 298
10 yr Member
invisable invisable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 298
10 yr Member
Default Good Question.........

Quote:
Originally Posted by rose_thorn98 View Post
Would wonder what an oncologist would say about that test result.
Never thought to go to an oncologist (duh!)

Well...........here's the latest update:

Had CT scan done of Abdomen & Pelvis (what an ordeal, had to drink contrast and had it put in veins.......Yuk! & Ouch! (my veins are small had to get......have a bruise the size of an orange and the color of a plum!)

No findings other than a Fibroid Tumor in Uterus (next stop Gyn)......

**Footnote - CT scan only picks up tumors 2mm or less.......ok so it's not a perfect world, but of course, I'm sure you know what I am thinking.......
"Gee what if mine is under 2mm????!!!!) Doc's answer, "Well, I guess that is possible, but I don't think so." Is that reassurring?? Don't they have to start out small?

Had a Colonoscopy - everything ok on that end.......

Doc's suggestion was to have blood retested in 3 months, he said, I might just run over the highpoint of the curve (20 points over one time, 10 the other.)

Or my thoughts.........my tumor is too small to pick up yet, so once it gets larger and spreads they will be able to see it on CT scan!!!!

ok, so I'm not exactly an optomist, but this is just the cherry on the top of the PN cake!!

Any scolding, support, comments, honest opinions welcome!
invisable is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 01-25-2011, 08:24 AM #12
mrsD's Avatar
mrsD mrsD is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 33,508
15 yr Member
mrsD mrsD is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
mrsD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 33,508
15 yr Member
Lightbulb

This test is not very specific for cancers by itself.

This article explains that:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/562265_3

you can join Medscape for free... and their copyright does not
allow me to copy it here.

There are other papers on Google using this keyword:
reliability of Ca19-9 test
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei

************************************

.
Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017


****************************
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
mrsD is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
invisable (01-25-2011)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Different kinds of ON? momXseven Multiple Sclerosis 6 02-13-2008 08:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.