advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2014, 06:06 AM #41
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,855
15 yr Member
glenntaj glenntaj is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,855
15 yr Member
Default That one hour level--

--is high.

Moreover, the big drop from hour one to hour two does suggest at least a degree of reactive hypoglycemia.

A draw at one-and-a-half hours would have been interesting to see, as would concomitant insulin levels along with the blood glucose level draws; I bet there would have been a big insulin spike, probably "out of range", somewhere around one to one and a half hours.
glenntaj is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
mrsD (09-16-2014)

advertisement
Old 09-16-2014, 01:57 PM #42
JHop11 JHop11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC
Posts: 23
8 yr Member
JHop11 JHop11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC
Posts: 23
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by en bloc View Post
That is sad to hear this. Repeat biopsies (especially after a course of treatment) to gauge improvement or disease progression is one of the best features of the biopsy.

How else can they tell if the fiber density has increased or gotten worse? You could consider printing some of the documentation that supports repeat biopsies...if you think they would even read it or be open to the idea. New medical technology does no good when doctors stop being teachable.


It wouldn't make any difference in treatment/management to have a second Bx. Even if the biopsy showed improvement, and someone is still experiencing symptoms, they're treatment will stay the same. Biopsies are not always used to monitor clinical progression. sometimes they are simply used for diagnosis.
JHop11 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 09:46 PM #43
en bloc's Avatar
en bloc en bloc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shenandoah Mountains, VA
Posts: 1,250
10 yr Member
en bloc en bloc is offline
Senior Member
en bloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shenandoah Mountains, VA
Posts: 1,250
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHop11 View Post
It wouldn't make any difference in treatment/management to have a second Bx. Even if the biopsy showed improvement, and someone is still experiencing symptoms, they're treatment will stay the same. Biopsies are not always used to monitor clinical progression. sometimes they are simply used for diagnosis.
I disagree and agree.

In many cases insurance requires certain treatments to be done first, before proceeding to a higher cost treatment. A follow up biopsy after 6 month course of immune suppression for autoimmune neuropathy, may confirm that fiber density has not improved and therefore allow patient to receive higher dollar treatments like IVIG.

It can also be used to continue IVIG treatments by showing improvement (whether or not the patient still has symptoms).

However, you are correct that biopsies are sometimes used simply for dx. Sometimes, this is enough to get approval for treatments like IVIG and insurance doesn't question it down the road for continued therapy.

Don't forget that some treatments carry high risk or possible reactions. For some patients that may have some decrease in symptoms (but still some problems) the f/u biopsy is very helpful to SEE exactly what is being accomplished and if just more time is needed or it's not worth proceeding.

It's a case by case decision as for whether the f/u biopsy is helpful or warranted.
en bloc is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
glenntaj (09-17-2014)
Old 09-18-2014, 05:19 PM #44
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default

Thanks for that. I'm still trying to get a grasp on all this. I have a glucose monitor and was using it that day to try to track things with the test, but it died on me. The last reading I got was 267, but I questioned that because it died shortly later (not the battery).

My regular doc just ordered another A1c test which I bet will be normal just like it was in July. It was 5.3% then.

Interestingly, I also just learned I have a high sensitivity to casein, the protein in dairy. I drink a glass of milk daily, have cream in my coffee in the morning, and usually eat yogurt and cheese on a daily basis too. They probably provide a big hunk of the carbs I'm eating right now, and they have to go.

Apparently this intolerance results in an immune response that causes systemic inflammation. This is something else I need to learn about now.



Quote:
Originally Posted by glenntaj View Post
--is high.

Moreover, the big drop from hour one to hour two does suggest at least a degree of reactive hypoglycemia.

A draw at one-and-a-half hours would have been interesting to see, as would concomitant insulin levels along with the blood glucose level draws; I bet there would have been a big insulin spike, probably "out of range", somewhere around one to one and a half hours.
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-30-2019, 12:17 PM #45
GeorgeQ GeorgeQ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 9
5 yr Member
GeorgeQ GeorgeQ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 9
5 yr Member
Default

hello janieg, wondering how are you after these years and if you found anything new in the mean time. I am pretty sure I ma suffering from SFN as well

thanks
GeorgeQ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 12:45 AM #46
Tarlov Australia Tarlov Australia is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 2
5 yr Member
Tarlov Australia Tarlov Australia is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 2
5 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFNgirl View Post
Hi, this is my first post, am totally new to this sort of thing. I started reading your posts over the last few weeks and decided I should join. You all have provided so much helpful information, very appreciated for the newly diagnosed.

I began having back pain and nerve symptoms last October, and after months of tests, was diagnosed in january through skin biopsy with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. I have gripping pain in my feet and freezing burning pain in my feet, legs, torso, back and neck. My hands mostly just go numb periodically, mostly at night in my sleep. In the midst of this, in December, I had an extremely painful attack in my face which took me to the ER and was diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia. In hindsight, my doctors do not believe its that but somehow related to the rest. Have any of you had this connected to your trigeminal nerve?

I am taking 2700 mg of gabapentin, Tramadol, Nortriptyline at night, and just finishing 2 month trial of steroid infusions. None of it seems to help.

I have seen mention from a few of you about a smaller subset of non length dependent type of SFN, given my body wide symptoms, am wondering if I fit in that category. And if so, is this something to pursue that might lead to an identification of an underlying cause or different treatment plan?

Thanks for listening,
SFNgirl
Hi SFNgirl
I was taking Lyrica (same as gabapentin) for my nerve pain and it helped for a while then stopped, I wasn't prepared to keep increasing the dose so weaned off it under medical supervision. I'm finding that R Alpha Lipoic Acid (natural substance) is helping me just as well as the Lyrica was. May be worth a try, but make sure you get the one with R in name, the one without isn't natural.
Hope it can help you as it's helped me.
Tarlov Australia is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 07:43 AM #47
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default

Hi George,

Keeping it short and sweet...still have it and am still idiopathic. Just went through an annual neuro check where MRIs were again perform from my brain to lumbar. Still no signs of demyelination, and all other tests were normal.

Janie

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeQ View Post
hello janieg, wondering how are you after these years and if you found anything new in the mean time. I am pretty sure I ma suffering from SFN as well

thanks
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
nilram (05-04-2019)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newly Diagnosed - Small Fiber/Large Fiber Neuropathy! Please Help! JoshuaY46012 Peripheral Neuropathy 17 11-12-2019 03:55 AM
idiopathic small fiber peripheral neuropathy cbar New Member Introductions 12 01-06-2013 05:57 PM
Small Fiber, Large Fiber & Autonomic Neuropathy Loves Pappilions Peripheral Neuropathy 9 06-01-2011 09:02 AM
I have been Dx with idiopathic small sensory nerve fiber neuropathy and nothing helps Hurtin' Nerves Peripheral Neuropathy 15 04-02-2010 07:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.