advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2015, 06:57 AM #51
mrsD's Avatar
mrsD mrsD is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 33,508
15 yr Member
mrsD mrsD is offline
Wisest Elder Ever
mrsD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 33,508
15 yr Member
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuroproblem View Post
@susanne, I think this is general attitude of most overworked, "welfare" doctors, they are less investigative than private doctors, or insurance based docs, because they are paid so much more to do thier job, and they dont even do it as much as other docs.
I have to disagree with you, neuroproblem. While your grammar is confusing here, it appears you are saying "welfare" doctors make more money?

In general doctors who take "welfare" patients tend to make much less money than private pay doctors. This is why many good doctors are no longer accepting medicaid patients (and even medicare now).
Many HMO's do take medicaid or medicaid sponsored State insurance plans. These have many rules internally for testing, and medication formularies to curtail costs or deemed unnecessary treatments. So in effect, people who have one of these plans will be less tested and not using the most expensive drugs for treatments. Usually the formularies are determined by the clinic or state depending on reimbursement figures and costs.

I apologize if I misunderstand your post. This being a written format, grammar is important for understanding your postings.
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei

************************************

.
Weezie looking at petunias 8.25.2017


****************************
These forums are for mutual support and information sharing only. The forums are not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.
mrsD is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 04-28-2015, 08:05 AM #52
Susanne C. Susanne C. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mid-Atlantic coast
Posts: 721
10 yr Member
Susanne C. Susanne C. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mid-Atlantic coast
Posts: 721
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuroproblem View Post
@susanne, I think this is general attitude of most overworked, "welfare" doctors, they are less investigative than private doctors, or insurance based docs, because they are paid so much more to do thier job, and they dont even do it as much as other docs.
These were highly paid private doctors, one the head of the EMG department at a large hospital, the other an important neurologist at Johns Hopkins. At the time my insurance had very few restrictions on tests, treatments and medications, and I was offered further genetic testing and a spinal tap but assured there would be no change in the treatment or diagnosis so I elected to let it drop as there seemed no point in further testing, and neither doctor felt that an ongoing relationship would be necessary. Once they know they can't help you they lose interest. I think it is more related to feeling it is a waste of their time and skills than money. My local neuro even said she would be taking money "under false pretenses" if she continued seeing me.
Susanne C. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 03:00 AM #53
twitchwitch twitchwitch is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: American living in Germany
Posts: 67
8 yr Member
twitchwitch twitchwitch is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: American living in Germany
Posts: 67
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragtop262 View Post
After dealing with various doctors over about 9 months now, I think much of this comes down to resources. The doctors are so busy. Where I am, it takes about 4 weeks to get an appointment with a general neurologist, who it seems is really only there to screen you to determine what sub-specialist you need to see. Then it takes 4 months to see the sub-specialist, who will do tests that primarily see if you have significant motor deficiencies. If you have a pure sensory neuropathy, they may not find any obvious physical symptoms.

So, if you have something like SFN, there are so many possible causes (it seems like hundreds), and so many tests that may have to be run to rule out each one. Then, if they find the cause, there's a good chance they won't be able to do anything about it anyway (other than pain treatment). So, it seems like they just don't want to spend the time and money, when there's so many other patients waiting to be treated.

I don't want to sound too negative on the doctors, I think they do the best they can. But just like everyone else in the working world, they have to prioritize things. And in the world of neurological problems, sensory neuropathies aren't that high on the list.

In my case, the neuromuscular specialist said he couldn't find any significant physical signs of PN. So, to "reassure" me, he said that whatever I had might be "uncomfortable and inconvenient" but he didn't think it was anything that would be fatal or disabling. (For some reason, I didn't feel all that much better after hearing that.)
I think every patient as the right to fair treatment, whatever their condition is, from a cut that gets infected to a paralyzed arm to MND. I can't believe that 3 neuros, of which one is a professor, cannot tell me why my arm is damaged. Or that they can't agree. By the way, two of the neuros (one is the professor) were private neuros, meaning, I paid them for all of their time and all of their tests, so resources can't be an issue there. I did that because I felt like the 3rd neuro (the one that goes through my insurance company) was rushing me and didn't take enough time.
__________________
*****
- Jul 2013 - Benign Fasciculation Syndrome (BFS)
- Mar 2015 - Spine herniations at C5/C6 and C6/C7
- Apr 2015 - L. Shoulder/Arm Neuralgic Amyotrophy/Plexus Neuritis

.
twitchwitch is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 08:06 AM #54
Ragtop262 Ragtop262 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Midwest
Posts: 381
8 yr Member
Ragtop262 Ragtop262 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Midwest
Posts: 381
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twitchwitch View Post
I can't believe that 3 neuros, of which one is a professor, cannot tell me why my arm is damaged. Or that they can't agree.
It's really frustrating when you can't get a definitive diagnosis.
But, it seems neurological disorders in general are very difficult to diagnose. Often, there are no lab tests, MRI scans, or surgeries that can tell the doctors exactly why your seemingly intact nerves are not functioning properly. Even the symptoms (such as pain) are difficult to interpret since they can't be physically measured and rely on the patients description. So, all the doctors are left with is making "educated guesses" based on your history and symptoms.

Hopefully there will be breakthroughs in this area soon. Unfortunately, it will probably be too late for most of us to benefit. But, at least our children might have access to better diagnostics and treatments in the future.
Ragtop262 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 04:22 PM #55
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragtop262 View Post
It's really frustrating when you can't get a definitive diagnosis.
But, it seems neurological disorders in general are very difficult to diagnose.
When I first had strange neuro problems 30 years ago that were defying diagnosis, my neurologist at the time apologized to me. His near-exact words were, "I'm sorry I can't give you a definitive answer on this. Neurology is where modern medicine was about 200 years ago. We have a long way to go."

Apparently another 170 years, and we'll stand a chance.
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
echoes long ago (04-30-2015), jenng (05-02-2015)
Old 04-29-2015, 04:48 PM #56
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Healthgirl Healthgirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 791
8 yr Member
Default

I don't know how common the twitching is for neuropathy or what it even means. I have everything on your list except for the weakness while twitching. My whole body especially my arms are weakened from what ever happened/is happening to me, but the twitching is random and migrates everywhere.
My neurologist hasn't said anything about it. He asks me if it is still happening when I see him and he just puts in in his computer. I think he is just waiting to see what happens with me.
Healthgirl is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 11:03 PM #57
jenng jenng is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 135
10 yr Member
jenng jenng is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 135
10 yr Member
Default @Twitchwitch

I was in the military when an outbreak of mono happened on base. They screened everyone & I was positive for Epstein Bar. I didn't have mono as a kid, but obviously I was a carrier. I think EB is also responsible for my positive screen for Lyme. Western blot is neg.
__________________
Idiopathic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy
Atypical Migraine
Chiari 1 malformation 7 mm
PLIF L5-S1 Sept. 2013

Lumbar MRI March 2013: degenerative changes from L3 to S1. L3 and L4 have tiny annular tears with disc bulge. L5-S1 bilateral pars defects anterolisthesis (spondylosis/spondylithesis?) I have an annular tear here too, along with a conjoined left L5-S1 nerve root. Mild effacement of the thecal sac at the origins of the bilateral S1 nerve roots, left greater than right. Mild bilateral Neural foraminal stenosis.
jenng is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 04-29-2015, 11:20 PM #58
anon050715
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
anon050715
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jenng View Post
I was in the military when an outbreak of mono happened on base. They screened everyone & I was positive for Epstein Bar. I didn't have mono as a kid, but obviously I was a carrier. I think EB is also responsible for my positive screen for Lyme. Western blot is neg.

Thank you for your service!
  Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
jenng (05-02-2015)
Old 04-29-2015, 11:47 PM #59
janieg's Avatar
janieg janieg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
janieg janieg is offline
Member
janieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 792
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jenng View Post
I was in the military when an outbreak of mono happened on base. They screened everyone & I was positive for Epstein Bar. I didn't have mono as a kid, but obviously I was a carrier. I think EB is also responsible for my positive screen for Lyme. Western blot is neg.
EBV is very common . You can be exposed, and have no symptoms.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868878

"The prevalence in 2009-2010 by age group was as follows: 6-8 years, 50%; 9-11 years, 55%; 12-14 years, 59%; 15-17 years, 69%; and 18-19 years, 89%."

The stat I've most commonly read on adults is that 95% will show antibodies for it.
janieg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
jenng (05-02-2015), Kitt (04-30-2015)
Old 04-30-2015, 02:26 AM #60
Neuroproblem Neuroproblem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 355
8 yr Member
Neuroproblem Neuroproblem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 355
8 yr Member
Default

ebv,herpes simplex 1 and chickenpox is very common, almost everyone is exposed to it by adulthood.
@mrsd it was the opposite of what your saying. i meant welfare are less likely to help you.
My neurological symptoms are being put off has mentally caused, which people often confuse both of them.
peripheral neuropathy, unlike autonomic have so many causes, that you cant really pinpoint an actual disease.
Neuroproblem is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
muscle fasciculations rsprin2 Parkinson's Disease 3 03-07-2013 08:03 AM
Tremors and fasciculations Lagr Traumatic Brain Injury and Post Concussion Syndrome 6 05-06-2012 02:32 PM
LDN and fasciculations homer80 Multiple Sclerosis 4 02-05-2010 11:01 PM
Fasciculations dtyree General Health Conditions & Rare Disorders 7 06-18-2009 12:25 PM
fasciculations BobbyB ALS News & Research 0 07-20-2007 12:49 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.