advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2016, 11:41 AM #1
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Default Skin Biopsy Results?

Back in Oct of 2015 I had a punch biopsy by Therapath Labs. Below are the results confirming SFN. My Neuro doctor never explained the Microscopic section. Does anyone know what that section implies?

Thanks,
Cliffman

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION:
A. From the sections that have been examined, there is no evidence of vasculitis or other histological
abnormalities based on the H&E stain. No amyloid is detected by the Congo Red stain. Both of these
disorders are focal and this analysis does not exclude the diagnosis.

EPIDERMAL NERVE FIBER DENSITY TEST:
Specimen Result Value ABNORMAL LOW NORMAL
A. Lt Thigh 5.91 < 6.2 6.2 - 6.8
B. Lt Calf 2.81 < 3.2 3.2 - 4.3
Cliffman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 01-22-2016, 11:52 AM #2
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
Default

Hi Clifffman,

I can only explain the last part, and would have to research the other bit, though I had done so for myself...just have forgotten since.

"No amyloid is detected by the Congo Red stain" is just protocol with any such biopsy, but it's useless really, since a true amyloidosis biopsy would have to be from abdominal fat. If you Google this, it'll all come up. The Congo Red stain is just the stain they use to detect the amyloid proteins, that's all. Mine was negative too, but since it's not an actual test for amyloidosis, note how the analysis ends, and said disease can cause SFN, I'll likely be tested for it but via a fat pad biopsy.

I hope this helps.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffman View Post
Back in Oct of 2015 I had a punch biopsy by Therapath Labs. Below are the results confirming SFN. My Neuro doctor never explained the Microscopic section. Does anyone know what that section implies?

Thanks,
Cliffman

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION:
A. From the sections that have been examined, there is no evidence of vasculitis or other histological
abnormalities based on the H&E stain. No amyloid is detected by the Congo Red stain. Both of these
disorders are focal and this analysis does not exclude the diagnosis.

EPIDERMAL NERVE FIBER DENSITY TEST:
Specimen Result Value ABNORMAL LOW NORMAL
A. Lt Thigh 5.91 < 6.2 6.2 - 6.8
B. Lt Calf 2.81 < 3.2 3.2 - 4.3
DavidHC is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
glenntaj (01-23-2016)
Old 01-22-2016, 12:01 PM #3
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Cliffman Cliffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 286
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHC View Post
Hi Clifffman,

I can only explain the last part, and would have to research the other bit, though I had done so for myself...just have forgotten since.

"No amyloid is detected by the Congo Red stain" is just protocol with any such biopsy, but it's useless really, since a true amyloidosis biopsy would have to be from abdominal fat. If you Google this, it'll all come up. The Congo Red stain is just the stain they use to detect the amyloid proteins, that's all. Mine was negative too, but since it's not an actual test for amyloidosis, note how the analysis ends, and said disease can cause SFN, I'll likely be tested for it but via a fat pad biopsy.

I hope this helps.
Thanks David..it does help.
Cliffman is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-22-2016, 12:27 PM #4
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
DavidHC DavidHC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 732
8 yr Member
Default

Glad to hear it.

I'll also add that the fat pad biopsy does not have 100% accuracy, but it's pretty good, something like 70-80%, if I recall correctly. The only way to know for sure is to biopsy the organ or organs affected, but that's much more invasive. That would given you 100% accuracy though. Probably more than you wanted to know about Amyloidosis.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffman View Post
Thanks David..it does help.
DavidHC is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
Cliffman (01-22-2016)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skin biopsy results- help boiler1993 Peripheral Neuropathy 14 08-02-2016 06:09 AM
Skin biopsy results panther Peripheral Neuropathy 20 01-01-2016 11:32 AM
Skin Biopsy Results Mere Peripheral Neuropathy 34 02-01-2010 05:38 AM
skin biopsy results amit Peripheral Neuropathy 6 05-14-2009 06:23 AM
Skin biopsy results KrisC Peripheral Neuropathy 15 07-10-2008 07:53 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.