NeuroTalk Support Groups

NeuroTalk Support Groups (https://www.neurotalk.org/)
-   Myasthenia Gravis (https://www.neurotalk.org/myasthenia-gravis/)
-   -   should I have a thymectomy? (https://www.neurotalk.org/myasthenia-gravis/170567-thymectomy.html)

Stellatum 05-29-2012 11:29 AM

should I have a thymectomy?
 
I just had a really inconclusive visit with my neuro. I asked about a thymectomy, and he said, pretty much, I can have one if I want. So? How do I decide? I appreciate it that he's not paternalistic, but I would like a bit more guidance here.

I'm 46. I understand they work better in younger patients. I've had myasthenia almost three years. I understand they work better in the beginning.

I don't want to have my sternum split. There's a surgeon in the area who does them robotically, but sometimes he starts and discovers he can't do it that way, so he splits the sternum. My neuro says I can talk to him and see if he's willing to just wake me up if it can't be done robotically, but he says "surgeons don't like to do that."

My impression about thymectomies is that in the absence of any pathology of the thymus (mine's normal) the jury is out on the effectiveness of the surgery. I'd welcome thoughts and information.

Abby

Brennan068 05-29-2012 11:33 AM

Can you get a biopsy of your thymus tissue done (or have you)? find out if you have hyper-plastia? My understanding is that unless the thymus is hyper-plastic you'll not see any improvement from a thymectomy.

Brian.

Stellatum 05-29-2012 12:14 PM

I thought thymic hyperplasia was something the CT-scan could reveal.

Abby

Brennan068 05-29-2012 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stellatum (Post 884166)
I thought thymic hyperplasia was something the CT-scan could reveal.

Abby

Some relatively recent research is showing that you can have micro-hyperplasia... that is small areas inside the thymus are hyperplastic but the thymus mass doesn't show itself as being hyperplastic. I don't know if this can be located via CT scan or not.

http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/co...3/847.full.pdf

Brian

bu452000 05-29-2012 03:15 PM

Very tuff decision to make. I had a Thymoma removed in '94 and again in '99 both split sternum and I can tell you it's no fun. At the time I did not have MG so removal had no affect on me, I ended up with MG anyway. Unless your symptoms are quite severe you might want to just let it be. Robotic removal though is less invasive and might be worth a shot. Tuff choices.
Al

AnnieB3 05-29-2012 11:30 PM

Abby, I don't think any of us can say one way or the other. There's so much more to consider than your MG. Surgery is very stressful on the body. Some people can get another AI after it.

Do you have enough support for the recovery time it takes?

I could point to this study or that one but the fact is that there is no definitive answer to whether or not a thymectomy will help. Most studies do say that a thymectomy in someone younger and done within the first year of the disease tends to be more successful.

I know you want to get better but at what cost? Only you can answer that.

Good luck with the decision.

Annie

Stellatum 05-30-2012 07:25 AM

Tricky decision. My husband is a high school teacher, so he's home in the summer, so now would be the time. These decisions are so hard to make. In the end, it's a gamble. I'm almost at three years, and I'm 46. Those are not in my favor. But I'm female, which is, and my symptoms are relatively mild. My doctor says he doesn't have an info on the effect of thymectomy on atypical MG, and he seemed to think that's relevant info. On top of it all, I'm still questioning my diagnosis. Brother.

Thanks for responding.

Abby

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieB3 (Post 884323)
Abby, I don't think any of us can say one way or the other. There's so much more to consider than your MG. Surgery is very stressful on the body. Some people can get another AI after it.

Do you have enough support for the recovery time it takes?

I could point to this study or that one but the fact is that there is no definitive answer to whether or not a thymectomy will help. Most studies do say that a thymectomy in someone younger and done within the first year of the disease tends to be more successful.

I know you want to get better but at what cost? Only you can answer that.

Good luck with the decision.

Annie


wbdolphin 05-30-2012 08:01 AM

Thymectomy?
 
I had my CT scan the 2nd week in November at which time my thymus was "mildly hyperplastic", but apparently big enough to have it removed. At that time I was only 3 weeks post 1st ocular symptom. When it was removed transternally on December 20th, it was 4 1/2" by 4 1/2". I would assume that it didn't grow that much in a month, it's just that the scans are not always accurate. As for pain, yes it hurt, but the painkillers did their job to make it manageable. The worst part was not sleeping on my side for 10 weeks. One month after surgery my ocular symptoms went away, and I stopped the mestinon about 2 months later.

I was 50 at the time of surgery and I'm female. Oh and the CT scan showed no thymoma as did pathology report after the surgery.

Get a 2nd or 3rd opinion???

My surgeon wouldn't have done the robotic anyway, doesn't like it because he doesn't know how big and involved the thymus is until he gets in there.

I would say go for it if 2nd opinion Dr okays it.

Stellatum 05-30-2012 09:00 AM

OK, I have come to a tentative decision. I think it is reasonable for me to have a thymectomy if it can be done transcervically. I do not expect it to cure my MG, or even to put me into remission, but there is a good chance that I will see some improvement.

One reason there are no conclusive studies is that "remission" means different things to different people. Some define it as no symptoms and no drugs. Others define it as no symptoms with continuing drugs. But it seems clear that there is good reason to hope for improvement, even for an older, seronegative patient who's had this disease a while. No guarantee, but reasonable hope.

I am going to see if I can meet with the surgeon and ask him:

1) Will imaging studies before the thymectomy help you determine whether mine can be done transcervically?
2) Are you willing to go into this with the agreement that if you begin and find that it can only be done transsternally, you will abort the procedure? For me, the transsternal thing is a deal-breaker.
3) Can this be done with some sort of anesthesia that doesn't involve muscle relaxants?

If he says yes to all three, then I think this is a reasonable gamble for me. I don't expect a remission, but the level of my symptoms right now is such that a noticeable improvement is all I need to live pretty normally. I'm going to call my neuro now and ask for a referral for a consultation.

Thanks, everyone, for talking this out with me.

Abby

Brennan068 05-30-2012 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stellatum (Post 884406)
OK, I have come to a tentative decision. I think it is reasonable for me to have a thymectomy if it can be done transcervically. I do not expect it to cure my MG, or even to put me into remission, but there is a good chance that I will see some improvement.

One reason there are no conclusive studies is that "remission" means different things to different people. Some define it as no symptoms and no drugs. Others define it as no symptoms with continuing drugs. But it seems clear that there is good reason to hope for improvement, even for an older, seronegative patient who's had this disease a while. No guarantee, but reasonable hope.

I am going to see if I can meet with the surgeon and ask him:

1) Will imaging studies before the thymectomy help you determine whether mine can be done transcervically?
2) Are you willing to go into this with the agreement that if you begin and find that it can only be done transsternally, you will abort the procedure? For me, the transsternal thing is a deal-breaker.
3) Can this be done with some sort of anesthesia that doesn't involve muscle relaxants?

If he says yes to all three, then I think this is a reasonable gamble for me. I don't expect a remission, but the level of my symptoms right now is such that a noticeable improvement is all I need to live pretty normally. I'm going to call my neuro now and ask for a referral for a consultation.

Thanks, everyone, for talking this out with me.

Abby

Regarding #3 - I'd not worry about them using muscle relaxants so long as they can assure you that you're out before they go in. They can do this easily, they just need to know before hand.

Brian

suev 05-30-2012 02:56 PM

Okay Abby, I'm going to be a bit of a wet blanket on the thymectomy idea.

You have a bunch of symptoms that align well with MG. But you also have many that do not. Until you have investigated the ion channel stuff that was mentioned in another post, I would suggest the invasive surgery (without guarantees) can wait. It can always be done later.

Perhaps it is time for you to seek another opinion - from yes - another neuro. Perhaps someone who has experience with channel voltage irregularities. At least consider that your episodic weakness is the major limitation on your life - - and ask yourself if it is likely to be positively impacted by a thymectomey?

I don't mean to offend...but I can't help thinking that there is more to discover before any kind of surgery.

If I have offended you, please accept my apologies in advance.

4-eyes 05-30-2012 03:28 PM

I kind of agree with Suev. It has always been my understanding that t-ectomy only works in ACHR positive MG.

As for the surgery itself, why would you want to do the transcervical when there are VATT and robotic surgeries available? Transcervical, altho not sternum-splitting, is quite painful and has a fairly long recovery period as well.

There is no general anesthetic that doesn't involve muscle relaxers to my knowledge. They must have you paralyzed so they can work, especially during chest surgery, when the lungs must be absolutely controlled while they work.

I think a new set of eyes (as in neuro) on the situation is a fine idea. You are being burdened with way too much of your treatment plan being left up to you.

Stellatum 05-30-2012 04:01 PM

Thanks, suev and 4-eyes. Oh my gosh, certainly no offense taken. I greatly appreciate the input. I guess it makes sense to look into the ion channel stuff. I think I was assuming that the testing would be inconclusive, even if they caught me during an episode.

I didn't realize that transcervical and robotic were different. I'm pretty sure my neuro said that the surgeon in the area does them robotically. So, that's good.

My neurologist leaves all the decisions up to me. He runs down the list and tells me the pros and cons. Actually, he tells me the cons. So the decision always seems to be just leaving things as they are. Which isn't necessarily the wrong decision...

Anyway, thank you both. I will keep thinking. Maybe I'll ask my neuro to either investigate the ion channelopathy idea or refer me to someone who will. When I was undiagnosed, he sent me to a different neuro in Boston, who diagnosed me, so we've done this before.

Abby

Juanitad 05-30-2012 05:33 PM

On #2, my thinking would be the opposite. If he starts the less invasive procedure and finds your thymus is so large or spread out, etc., he needs to do the sternum route, I would want it out even more because I might gain more benefit from having it removed. Just a thought!

Stellatum 05-30-2012 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juanitad (Post 884526)
On #2, my thinking would be the opposite. If he starts the less invasive procedure and finds your thymus is so large or spread out, etc., he needs to do the sternum route, I would want it out even more because I might gain more benefit from having it removed. Just a thought!

Hmm...that makes sense, and I have a feeling that the surgeon will not be willing to agree to the "just wake me up if you can't do it robotically" idea. But ho boy, I really don't want to wake up to find I just had a sternotomy, especially because of what it might do to my MG.

I am reading some more about ion channelopathies, and it looks like if there's a real possibility that I have some form of periodic paralysis, anesthesia could be very dangerous for me.

Abby

schavarria 05-30-2012 09:54 PM

Thymectomy?
 
Hi Abby,
I had a robotic thymectomy back in December, 6 months post diagnosis via SFEMG and 2.5 years post symptoms start. I am seronegative. I too asked if they could abort the operation if it turned out they couldn't do it robotically. A nurse told me that they would only change to the transcervical method if it became a life/death situation, and that she only recalled it happening once in the previous 5 years or so. I don't feel improvement from the surgery yet, and have actually added imuran since then. My neuro in Chicago told me that most research done on the effectiveness of thymectomy is done on antibody positive folks and so might not be reflective of seronegative patients. I was in hospital 4 days, at work after 2 weeks, could've used more rest but oh well. Best wishes to you!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stellatum (Post 884406)
OK, I have come to a tentative decision. I think it is reasonable for me to have a thymectomy if it can be done transcervically. I do not expect it to cure my MG, or even to put me into remission, but there is a good chance that I will see some improvement.

One reason there are no conclusive studies is that "remission" means different things to different people. Some define it as no symptoms and no drugs. Others define it as no symptoms with continuing drugs. But it seems clear that there is good reason to hope for improvement, even for an older, seronegative patient who's had this disease a while. No guarantee, but reasonable hope.

I am going to see if I can meet with the surgeon and ask him:

1) Will imaging studies before the thymectomy help you determine whether mine can be done transcervically?
2) Are you willing to go into this with the agreement that if you begin and find that it can only be done transsternally, you will abort the procedure? For me, the transsternal thing is a deal-breaker.
3) Can this be done with some sort of anesthesia that doesn't involve muscle relaxants?

If he says yes to all three, then I think this is a reasonable gamble for me. I don't expect a remission, but the level of my symptoms right now is such that a noticeable improvement is all I need to live pretty normally. I'm going to call my neuro now and ask for a referral for a consultation.

Thanks, everyone, for talking this out with me.

Abby


TexasRose 05-31-2012 07:06 AM

I am 52 and have mild MG for probably years, but was diagnosed last year. Don't let age stop you from considering surgery - you're as young as you'll ever be!

My surgeon also told me he would try (robotically) via the right side, then the left and and if that didn't work, do the surgery via sternum. I didn't have a thymoma (according to CT scan), but the thymus was slightly enlarged when he took it out. I have a DVD of the procedure, so I can see how he removed the whole thymus at one time. It is amazing what they can see via robotics; it is magnified x 10 and the robotic arms make the surgeon's hands more steady. I would recommend at least talking to the robotic surgeon.

Everyone is different (of course), but my neuro thinks most people with MG should have a thymectomy because it can cause so much trouble down the road. I put it off, but decided I would have surgery before I got weaker.

Stellatum 05-31-2012 03:07 PM

OK! I am very pleased with myself and grateful for everyone's help. I just talked to my neurologist and I told him I didn't think I have emphasized my "episodes" enough--how they come on quite suddenly and how severe they are. I explained that they're really becoming the salient feature of my illness. And I asked him if he'd be willing to look into the possibility of ion channelopathies, at the very least to set that possibility to rest before I have a thymectomy. And he said yes. He said that he doesn't think they present with the SFEMG results I got, but he'd talk to his partner and look into it.

Abby

Brennan068 05-31-2012 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stellatum (Post 884848)
OK! I am very pleased with myself and grateful for everyone's help. I just talked to my neurologist and I told him I didn't think I have emphasized my "episodes" enough--how they come on quite suddenly and how severe they are. I explained that they're really becoming the salient feature of my illness. And I asked him if he'd be willing to look into the possibility of ion channelopathies, at the very least to set that possibility to rest before I have a thymectomy. And he said yes. He said that he doesn't think they present with the SFEMG results I got, but he'd talk to his partner and look into it.

Abby

Good on you chasing down this possibly Abby. Hope you find the answer you're looking for.

Best.:hug:

Brian

TexasRose 05-31-2012 07:26 PM

Mine was done without muscle relaxants.

suev 06-01-2012 09:15 AM

Abby - this is very good news!! While it may be unfortunate that you have to do most of the 'thinking outside the box'; your neuro gets major points for being so patient friendly!!

One thing that I would encourage you to get into your 'record of symptoms' is what you said in another post about the 'awake sleep' when you were very young. I don't know why I think this, but that symptom may actually cause an 'AHA!' moment for your docs.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.