![]() |
OFF TOPIC: Reminiscing...1957...The Real Sputnik Story
Let's see I was 9 yrs old when I began the nightly "watch the sky" nights. It was so low in orbit we could see it from earth.
The Real Sputnik Story Forget the hype. The '57 launch wasn't such a big shock. By Sharon Begley NEWSWEEK Updated: 4:45 PM ET Oct 1, 2007 On the Saturday morning in 1957 after the Soviet Union launched the world's first manmade satellite and inaugurated the space age, President Dwight Eisenhower played golf, a NEWSWEEK reporter in Boston described "massive [public] indifference" and some American papers ran the story as a small box on page three. And why not? The Soviets had announced plans to go into space no fewer than 20 times since 1951: as part of their participation in the International Geophysical Year (IGY), a global program to study Earth's physics starting in July 1957, they even told an American official the orbital speed and launch site of the little satellite they planned. It usually takes time for myths to take hold. But in the case of Sputnik—launched on Oct. 4, 1957—myth supplanted reality within days and continues to warp the lessons of that "red moon." Less than a week after Sputnik began orbiting Earth once every 96 minutes, politicians and the press had spun it into a shocking symbol of Soviet superiority that could soon lead to nukes falling on American cities. But far from being alarmed by Sputnik, newly released archives show, Eisenhower and his military and intelligence advisers welcomed it. The terror triggered by the uninstrumented, 184-pound silvery satellite, roughly the size and shape of a blue-ribbon watermelon and emitting an A-flat beep from its rudimentary radio transmitter, had little basis in reality. With Sputnik's 50th anniversary this week, we're in danger of getting it wrong yet again, for the supposed lessons of Sputnik are ones we should actually unlearn. Most important, it is wrong to believe "that the American people need 'another Sputnik' " to increase our competitive juices in space or technology, says historian Walter McDougall of the University of Pennsylvania, author of the 1997 book "The Heavens and the Earth." The United States "does not need another ill-conceived spasmodic reaction to some humiliation that does not pose an immediate threat." READ FULL ARTICLE |
Thanks, Carolyn! I was 9 years old, too, and loved seeing Sputnik!
But in the early 60's looking in the skies was scary because I was afraid the Russians were Coming. Dr. Strangelove, the film, depressed me at the time. We practiced 'duck and cover' in school, and had air raid drills where we lined up in the halls curled into balls. Or under our desks. Ridiculous, but it scared me. The NY Times sold body bags for your bomb shelter. Nice. |
Yes thanks
I was 11 yrs. old going to school in Mich. Sue
|
I was 13. I can't remember a darn thing about that time, except that I thought that the Sputnik was HUMONGOUS.
Apparently, the lies were bigger than the reality. Sounds like now :mad: I wish we'd spend our time and energy taking care of people and finding solutions, instead of pimping War all over the world. :hug: Barb |
....and bringing it up to date, today, once again, I listened to the sonic booms of the space shuttle as it landed at KSC. Piloted by a woman, after a difficult job installing and repairing things at the space station, also piloted by a woman.
There is peace and cooperation in space. I think that must be where you have to go to find it and realize what we are throwing away. paula |
And in 10 years...
WE built the Saturn 5 engines. 10 years!!!!!!!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by
vB Optimise (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.