Discuss this article
 

Finally, the 'Ice Princess' melts


After reading the letter Thursday defending Hillary Clinton for showing a little emotion, I had to respond.

I am writing because the author of the letter, while defending Clinton, perhaps unknowingly maligned one of the greatest New York Yankees who ever lived. Juxtaposing the emotions that Lou Gehrig expressed during his farewell address, after being diagnosed with what is now known as Lou Gehrig's Disease, to one of actor Tom Hanks' lines in a movie is a preposterous way for the writer to support her thesis.

The context of Hanks' movie line was funny. Gehrig's words and tears were not. The man was told he was going to die, and yet he felt lucky because the fans' applause told him just how much they cared.

Insofar as the other male comparisons are concerned, lighten up. Some people show their emotions, and some do not. If Cinton's show of emotions was sincere, it is about time. But, in all fairness, Clinton has been referred to as the "Ice Princess" for good reason, and I think most would agree that had it been someone such as Geraldine Ferraro showing emotion instead, it would not have become the issue that it has.

Craig J. Carney

Bradenton

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article...-1/newssitemap

Editorial

Judging the dying: Oregon's experience
The "death with dignity" ballot measure promoted by former Gov. Booth Gardner deserves public support.

Assisted suicide for the terminally ill is humane and, as Oregon has demonstrated, can be administered in a civilized way. It provides a choice that is actually taken by fewer than two dying people per thousand, but for them it solves a terrible problem. The people who used Oregon's law in 2006 — 46 did so — were very ill. Forty had terminal cancer and most of the rest had Lou Gehrig's disease. They were people who were losing control over their motions and bodily functions; some of them were in great pain. They were not ending their lives on a whim.

Having the option of taking one's life is a comfort even to some who never do it. Here are Oregon's figures. In 2006, 35 people ordered a lethal dose of drugs and used them. Another 11 used drugs they had received before 2006. That's the 46. Another 19 died of their diseases even though they had the drugs and could have used them. Eleven had received the drugs and were still alive at the end of the year.

Many people who opposed Oregon's law feared that patients would be railroaded into suicide. The law has a number of safeguards to prevent this — waiting periods, doctors' signatures and witnesses who aren't named in the patient's will. It can't be used for non-adults, nonresidents, the nonterminal, the mentally impaired or anyone who objects.

There have been no big scandals under this law, which has been used by a small and steady number of patients. In a population of 3.7 million, of which 30,000 die each year, deaths under the law have been running at about 40 per year. That suggests a death rate for Washington of about 70 per year.

Gardner's law will not affect many people. But those it does affect, and their families, will be thankful for its passage.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._deaded10.html