![]() |
Benefits of HBOT therapy
I am relatively new to RSD/CRPS I. That being stated, I research this disease to understand what I can do to heal/help myself..be it knowledge, pt, etc.
I believe a discourse of this subject is best weighed out on an individual basis; specifically, on a case by case basis. Each of us are individuals thus one treatment for one may not be good for another. I found this article to be beneficial to the HBOT discussion: http://www.rsds.org/3/research/hbot_mcadamshtm.htm I hope this broadens the discussion on HBOT therapy, whereas a decision can be made with all sides being discussed. :grouphug: Dew |
Thanks Dew for posting it,
Numb |
Here you go Dew and Numb
There are always many sides to one issue as you stated earlier Dew. But, here is an link I think will explain more in detail and easy to follow:
http://www.vet.utk.edu/vhms/pdf/Free...genSpecies.pdf The Physiology of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Free Radicals and Reactive Oxygen Species I. Introduction – Definition, Source, function and Purpose A. Definition of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). 1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive ions and “free radicals” (chemicals containing atoms with an unpaired electron in its outer orbit) involving oxygen molecules. 2. “Free radicals” are present that do not contain oxygen, but ROS refers to free radicals containing oxygen molecules. 3. Characteristics: a. Short lived b. Unstable c. React with other molecules to achieve stability B. Source of ROS’s 1. Byproduct of cellular respiration (presence of redox cycling compounds). 2. Synthesized by enzyme systems – phagocytic cells, neutrophils and macrophage (NADPH oxidase, myeloperoxidases). 3. Exposure to ionizing radiation 4. Smoking, herbicides, pesticides, fried foods, etc. 5. Production: a. Chain reaction, a free radical steals an electron from a nearby compound forming a new free radical. Free radicals may steal electrons from cellular structures or molecules. b. By normal cellular respiration – electron transport system – often oxygen is the terminal electron acceptor in the cell mitochondria ROS c. Figure on production of common free radical species. 2 C. Function and purpose 1. Necessary for production of some hormones (thyroxine). 2. Generated to kill some types of bacteria and engulfed pathogens. 3. Normal cell functions and cell signaling. 4. A balance: a. Free radicals generated by normal processes do become harmful if inadequate anti-oxidant defenses are present. A balance between production and removal/inactivation is required. b. When free radicals are present in excess of the defense mechanism’s ability to control them is when damage may occur. c. Anti-oxidants – compounds which will provide electrons to free radicals to neutralize them. The compounds are able to accommodate the loss of an electron without becoming reactive. d. Anti-oxidants: Vitamin E, SOD, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, Vitamin C, beta-carotene, coenzyme Q. D. Free radicals in disease. Excessive free radical production has been involved in the occurrence in several disease processes. 1. drug toxicities 2. inflammation 3. aging 4. fibrosis 5. carcinogenesis 6. lipid peroxidation cellular membranes 7. implicated in several specific diseases a. atherosclerosis b. degenerative neurologic disease c. reperfusion injury 8. oxygen toxicity Triplet Oxygen Superoxide anion Hydrogen peroxide Hydroxyl radical Water +e- +e- +e- +e- 3O2 ----------> • O2 - ---------- > H2O2 ---------> •OH ------------> H2O +H+ +H+ +H+ +H+ 3 II. Reactive Oxygen Species A. Individual species 1. Superoxide anion a. • O2 - 2. Hydroxyl radical a. • OH 3. Hydrogen peroxide a. H2O2 4. Nitric oxide a. • NO 5. Hypochlorite ion a. OCl- 6. Ozone a. O3 7. Thiyl radicals a. RS • 8. Carbon centered radicals a. • O2CCl3 III. HBOT and ROS’s A. ROS affects depend on; 1. balance with anti-oxidant production 2. physical condition of the patient 3. concentration, frequency and duration of hyperbaric oxygen exposure. B. Exposure limits 1. 2.5 ATA and less no significant increase in ROS production. 2. Frequency and duration of treatment that might significantly increase ROS production in horses is not known. a. The limits of accumulative or acute exposure to hyperbaric oxygen have not be established. C. HBOT and benefits of ROS production 1. Enhancement of antimicrobial effects of cellular immunity especially in hypoxic environments. 2. Some evidence exists that indicating that HBOT may actually decrease lipid peroxidation in cell membranes. 4 IV. Facts about free radicals, ROS, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. A. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy using pressures at or less than 2.5 ATA do not significantly increase ROS in the presence of normal anti-oxidant defenses. B. The detrimental effects of ROS is seen when there is an imbalance between ROS production and the bodies anti-oxidant production or availability. C. ROS are generally a family of compounds that are short lived, unstable and highly reactive and will react with cellular molecules to achieve stability. D. A certain amount of ROS are produced by normal cell respiratory functions through the electron transport system. E. ROS and free radicals have an important role in the oxidative killing of micro-organisms. F. A variety of anti-oxidants are either produced by the body or provided by dietary absorption for use in maintaining the balance between ROS and anti-oxidant defenses. References 1. Bitterman, H et.al. “Effects of hyperbaric oxygen in circulatory shock induced by splanchnic artery occlusion and reperfusion in rats”. Can J Physiol Pharm. 2989;67:1033- 1037. 2. Dirks RC, Faiman MD. “Free radical formation and lipid peroxidation in rat and mouse cerebral cortex slices exposed to high oxygen pressure”. Brain Res. 1982;248: 355-60. 3. Grim PS, Nahum A, Gottlieb L, et. al. “ Lack of measurable oxidative stress during HBO therapy in burn patients”. Undersea Biomed Res. 1989;16(Suppl.):22 (Abstract). 4. Hammerlund C. “The physiologic ffects of hyperbaric oxygen”. In Hyperbaric Medicine Practice. Kindwall and Wheln eds. Best Publishing Co., Flagstaff. 2nd ed. 1999: 58-60. 5. Harabin AL, Braisted JC, Flynn ET. “response of antioxidant enzymes to intermittent and continuous hyperbaric oxygen”. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69(1):328-335. 6. Raskin P, Lipman RL, Oloff CM. “Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on lipid peroxidation in the lung”. Aerosp Med. 1971;42: 28-30. 7. Thom SR. “ CO poisoning in the rat model: Physiological correlation with clinical events and the effects of HBO”. Undersea Biomed Res. (Suppl) 1989;16:51-52 (Abstract). 8. Thom SR. “ Molecular mechanism for antagonism of lipid peroxidation in the rat. Undersea Biomed Res (suppl) 1990:17; 53-54. 5 Web Information |
By the Way
1.5ata to 2.4ata is the general protcol for HBOT for RSD/CRPS. I usually dive at 1.8ata. I also have a antioxidant rich diet and take antioxidant suppliments ie:vitamin e, grapeseed extract and pine bark. I juice daily and eat plenty of raw veggies. Oh, you can also have damage from too much antioxidants.....moderation is key here on the suppliments. Also, aging increases OFR, diet, medicines and environment. HBOT is a personally choice, just as pharmacueticals are. It is cost prohibited and I think THAT is the shame. Just my 2cents worth. Di
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by
vB Optimise (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.