NeuroTalk Support Groups - Needed? a forum for people suffering foreclosure and other legal problems -

NeuroTalk Support Groups (https://www.neurotalk.org/)

- Social Chat (https://www.neurotalk.org/social-chat/)

- - Needed? a forum for people suffering foreclosure and other legal problems - (https://www.neurotalk.org/social-chat/27201-forum-people-suffering-foreclosure-legal.html)

Mornin CT. :hug:

Big brother Live Feed huh?? That'll rot your brain. http://www.justblowme.com/images/smilies/fight.gif If you know what I mean. http://www.scrapbook-bytes.com/chat/...dded/laugh.gif I watch BB every year up until two years ago. It has changed so much since the first one, I just lost interest. Just like "Survivor". I LOVED that show but after what 8 years?? That too has lost it's charm. The only Reality show I watch now is "Fat March". NOW they are struggling. http://bestsmileys.com/paranoid/1.gif

"Crash"?? No, I don't think I have heard of that movie but I will check that out. I watch a lot of movies. Judy Dench? Love her. There is another movie you may like, Mrs "Something", let me go get the review I did, brb...........

Nope, I was incorrect. it wasn't Mrs Something it was Vera Drake:

]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/ima...9/photo_08.jpg

"Vera Drake" is a powerful British drama that was nominated for three Academy Awards: Best Actress (Imelda Staunton), Best Director (Mike Leigh), and Best Original Screenplay (Leigh again). As far as I am concerned, the movie was one of 2004's best.

In the title role, Imelda Staunton gives a performance I'll never forget. Vera Drake is a middle-aged, working-class, devoted wife and mother who earns money by cleaning the houses of the well-to-do. She's goodhearted, energetic, cheerful, and always helping others.

I would say the scenes with Vera's family in their cramped living quarters are the film's strongest. There's her mechanic husband, her tailor son, her shy daughter, and the daughter's suitor. The ensemble acting and dialogue are terrific.

"Vera Drake" is set in London in 1950, and one of the things I like most about the movie is its sense of time and place. The country hasn't fully recovered from World War II, and some commodities are still hard to get. But the Drake family has backbone, and when I think about Britain standing up to the Nazis, it's folks like them who come to mind.

The film's story centers around something Vera does that she keeps secret from her family. In her zeal to help others, she regularly performs a procedure on women that terminates unwanted pregnancies. Vera receives no money for this, and there is no doubt that her intentions are good. But what she is doing is illegal, and she is putting the women in danger because she has no connection whatsoever with any medical professionals.

However, all of the women Vera tries to help by inducing miscarriages are from the lower classes. The movie contrasts their situation sharply with that of a woman who lives in one of the upscale houses where Vera works as a cleaning lady. When that woman becomes pregnant, she goes to carefully chosen doctors and pays a considerable sum of money, enabling her to check into what appears to be a private clinic and get a safe, legal abortion.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/schedule.htm

this radio show probably has books and guests who know

good luck

FRIDAY - SEPTEMBER 7 - Take Back America

This spectacular panel of researchers, actual participants, and judicial educators believe strongly this is the correct direction that every hard working Americans MUST become aware of to protect themselves, their property, assets and heritage. This may be just the medicine to stop the current Corporate/Government tyranny in it's corrupted, insatiable take-over.

GUESTS:
Rae Copitka, Loma Wharton, Dennis Wharton, Reyavoni Carter, and Al Chazn

Sample Presentation starts 7-8 minutes in to Douglas, County Commissioners meeting on AUGUST 8; and again on AUGUST 29:
http://www.co.douglas.or.us/bocwebcasts.asp

http://www.thepowerhour.com/schedule.htm

comes on at 2am nyc time and 4pm internet link is on there to click

OMG, I didn't know you replied. I was picturing you at work and too busy to write. I wonder if I didn't get a notice because this was moved.

BB was explosive this season... they have a father and daughter who were estranged. And he's been a favorite of a lot of people... but he's a bit abusive.

You should check it out... except it's calmed way down since they got rid of Jen who apparently was/is a nanny for Vanna White... They just hated her. She was a little over the top, from my perspective... but the way Evel **** treated her was... not appropriate, I didn't think. The father is Evel ****.

Crash is really good. It was mentioned at the Academy Awards. Sandra Bullock is in it, but it's not a sweet movie. I liked it a lot more than i expected to.

Well, I'm glad I found this. :)

I'm confused. You didn't watch Mrs. Brown?

I never heard of the Vera Drake one.

I watched one the other night called Mrs. (darn I forget the name) at the Claridge. It said it was written by Elizabeth Taylor. It was quite charming. It was a movie you can watch right away... on your computer.

I sure hope I can sleep tonight. I have a lot I should do tomorrow.

Whew!

Hi Cloudz,

Thank you for the links. I'm not sure I understand the Douglas one.

That's really nice of you to find that information for me.

I posted that bit from my Brief on eBay and got cut to shreads. Mostly people there just attack, not all, but some.

But, it did show me that it was hard to read so I rewrote it...
I'll put it here the way it actually appears, except I'll put what the lawyer said in bold... so you can see where I'm quoting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karen Kline in her Statement of the Case

March 8, 2006, because of my disability and the trauma from no notice of judgment and sale and short notice of hearing I didn’t fully understand hearing. I showed my confusion by thanking Judge Vigil for saying he was glad I made it, 10:11:06. Thanks after painfully short notice showed confusion as my stammering showed my disability. I knew I needed my bankruptcy to protect my property because of my 1997 experience, but combination of no and little notice confused me: I withdrew my motion to reopen so it wouldn’t conflict with state court, which was confused because I knew I needed its protection from state court. When I couldn’t grasp or remember I wanted the CD transcribed, but CD given to Agnes Samora, Adult Protective Services, March 13, 2006 [RP 439], was Ftr. It didn’t work on CD player where it was to be made into a tape, so I couldn’t see what happened. Leverick was way too fast/immoderate for me to follow at the time. To comprehend it now I had to listen more than ten times. I couldn’t grasp how Sale was confirmed despite violation of stay. Now I know Leverick falsely said at 10:22:32 that Complaint was filed March 5, 2005. In fact it was filed March 9, 2005 [RP 1]. At 10:22:40 he lied, “We got notification through the bankruptcy center that the Chapter 13 had been filed on March 23rd 2005 which was after the date we had served her with the Amended Complaint.” In fact my Chapter 13 which was filed March 21, 2005, see Exhibit 1 referenced p.1 of “Correction to Objection to Approval of Sale and Foreclosure Judgment” [RP 223] and amended complaint was served on March 29, 2005 [RP 64, 66, 68, 70] in patent violation of the automatic stay. I could not grasp what Leverick speciously said at 10:22:53, “However under Rules 1-005 subparagraph (A) we’re not required to serve her with the Amended Complaint ah if we don’t seek new or additional claims against her. Specifically it says, ‘No service need be made on parties in default for failure to appear except pleadings that assert new or additional claims for relief.’ The Amended Complaint was only brought before the court to add the additional parties to deal with their claims and their interest in the property. It did not assert a new or additional claim against Ms. Kline and therefore, and this has been the practice of this law firm for a long period of time, we were not required to serve her with any supplemental pleadings in the case.” By law I had 30 days to answer from service of Complaint on March 18, 2005 [RP 62]. I was not in default on March 29, 2005 [RP 66] when Amended Complaint was served in violation of stay; and Amended Complaint did not bring parties before court. It was served to no one at any other time. I could not grasp how sale was confirmed after I wired money to reinstate 10:17:25, wire instructions attached at [RP 440]; despite saying at 10:17:54 I’d tried to deposit $128,250; and after saying at 10:18:51 that condo association’s liens exceeded what is authorized by Condominium Act. I got sick on the way home and was sick for hours. That night I realized what the hearing was, why I needed the bankruptcy court, and why Green had Hope call me to be sure I came, so I wouldn’t lose my rights, he said, according to Hope. In reality he needed me for an illusion of due process. That was why Judge Vigil was glad to see me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chemar (Post 144217)

Hi karen

I have copied your first post here to Doc's sticky thread on forum feedback for new forum requests, and moved the rest of this thread here to social as it has become more of such a discussion now

here is the link to the forum requests thread where your first post now is
http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/showthread.php?t=2849

I'm so confused.

I was thinking when I posted that I had the right forum... and then when the thread became friendly I thought it was similar to "Face Off" which never got moved...

Is it because I'm sooooo tired that I'm confused...

probably.

.