FAQ/Help |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
01-16-2013, 07:34 AM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Its been 45 days since my remand hearing and stil no word. What a bunch of crap. Why do we have to suffer so long? I am so worried it will be denied again because of what the doctor they hired for my medical exam said. But they are suppose to put more weight on my doctor, in that case its a slam dunk. I dont know??? going crazy one day at a time in Michigan.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-16-2013, 09:25 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-17-2013, 10:10 AM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
My attorney did'nt see the ss doctor report until just before the hearing when we were going over everything. He says even with that I have a case to win if not with this judge then with the appeals council. I am 45. Before my last hearing my lawyer told me this is the worst judge in the state maybe in the country. His approval rate is 9%. So dam the bad luck right. It has been a 4 year fight to this pointe. I was injured at work in 2005, had two open back surgery's the last one was a triple spinal fusion in 2009.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-17-2013, 10:20 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | bretd (01-19-2013) |
01-17-2013, 10:54 AM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | bretd (01-19-2013) |
01-17-2013, 09:09 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I hope that you hear soon bret
__________________
. Gee, this looks like a great place to sit and have a picnic with my yummy bone ! |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | bretd (01-19-2013) |
01-17-2013, 10:38 PM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
It is the job of an Administrative Law Judge to make a judgment and assess credibility. There are people who lie and exaggerate and pretend to be disabled. That is not intended to be a personal indictment, but an observation. Since there is not enough money to pay the current obligations *edit* it is doubtful that Congress is going to make it easier to qualify. But who knows. *edit* Last edited by Chemar; 01-18-2013 at 08:13 PM. Reason: NT political guidelines |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | finz (01-18-2013) |
01-18-2013, 01:07 AM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by Chemar; 01-18-2013 at 08:14 PM. Reason: Nt political guidelines |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | bretd (01-19-2013) |
01-18-2013, 01:42 AM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
In order to sort the crooks from the honest people, there has to be someone to judge, there has to be a system. It cannot be determined only by individual opinion of the applicant. Most people who apply for disability benefits believe that they are disabled enough to qualify. A few people file and think they can scam the government, but that is not the majority. However, if you could compare your life to all other applicants, you would find that some are sicker or more limited than you and others are less sick and less limited to you. There has to be a line drawn. And the interpretation of the law that defines that line has to be done by a person trained to do so, an ALJ or a DDS analyst. People can become severely disabled at any age, more likely as they get older, but it can happen anytime - accident, illness, injury. Last edited by Chemar; 01-18-2013 at 08:15 PM. Reason: quoted post has been edited |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-18-2013, 12:02 PM | #10 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by Chemar; 01-18-2013 at 08:18 PM. Reason: NeuroTalk Guidelines and quoted post was edited |
||
Reply With Quote |
"Thanks for this!" says: | Rayandnay (01-18-2013) |
Reply |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
remand hearing | Social Security Disability | |||
remand hearing over | Social Security Disability | |||
remand hearing | Social Security Disability | |||
remand hearing | Social Security Disability | |||
remand for second hearing | Social Security Disability |