the short form would be six questions the long form is much longer.

you are getting good advice. get an appointment as quickly as possible with someone so that you can how a visit. if you have no visits in the last 14 years, then you are going to have problems with the review.

my review period was 3 years but i didnt get one until 7 years, so you probably just slipped through the cracks.

I don't see why sending them the report that the doctor made wouldn't be as equal as the doctor that diagnosed.

You're making it sound like no matter what is filled out on the form, I will be denied.

If you received the short form and haven't seen a doc about whatever qualified you for SSI or SSDI, then you will likely be sent the long form CDR in the next 6 weeks or so. (Or perhaps, you already have the long form.)

The long form CDR process is comparable to going through the original application process to qualify for SSI /SSDI. SS will likely send you to a consulting doc/s paid by SS. Sometimes applicants/recipients are very unhappy with the results of those exams. Sometimes the exams are very rushed.

SS used to have less stringent requirements for SSI recipients that qualified as children, and allowed them to continue receiving benefits as adults. For certain conditions, it is now much more difficult to continue receiving benefits.

So, there are lots of factors that could make the CDR process more complicated than you'd imagine. The suggestions given here by several of us are to try and prepare you for a worst case scenario, so that you are not blindsided. If your benefits are ceased, you will be able to appeal, but having current medical records would likely be necessary.

It didn't seem very rushed and they approved fairly quickly from what they believed the case to be, which is true.

I was 23 years old when I applied and was granted assistance. I am now 37 with this review update.

The DSM on my condition changed, that shouldn't make it more difficult for those of us that have it. Social Security is obviously aware of the change.

Again, the evaluation report I have would be what the one that diagnosed me. Not like the information in black and white would miraculously change.
/

You are free to ignore any info we provide, but understand we are trying to help you.

http://autisticadvocacy.org/wp-conte...ASAN_final.pdf It appears that SS will not consider your older diagnosis valid and will expect you to be retested.

I do not think that SSA will even read a seventeen year old medical record for a CDR in 2014. If SSA just needed the diagnosis from seventeen years ago, they would not be contacting you at all.

That is my observation.

When you qualified for SS benefits, Asperger's was included as a "Listed Impairment" but since the DSM has changed, that is apparently no longer automatically the case.

Your condition is possibly the same, it might be better, or it might be worse. So long as you're alive, you're susceptible to change--both negative and positive. And I'm not saying that your Asperger's itself has changed, but rather your ability, or inability, to adapt to your disability--and therefore your ability to work. Some people have found that going to college or utilizing Vocational Rehabilitation Training, has helped them learn to adapt in the workforce.

I would not personally trust a Consultative Examiner to spend the time to adequately diagnose me. If SS decides you need to be retested, and IF you no longer qualify with a "listed impairment", you may still qualify via SS's 5 step process to determine SSI/SSDI eligibility. But that is process is not as easy as what you dealt with previously.


"Exceptions to the Medical Improvement Standard

The SSA does not need to show that your impairment has medically improved if:

•you are working over the SGA level
•you have had vocational training that makes it possible for you to return to work (for example, your RFC limited you to sedentary work and you are now qualified for sedentary work because of a class you took)
•a new method for evaluating the severity of your condition shows you are not disabled, or
•there was an error in the initial determination and you should not have been found disabled (for example, clear evidence was found in your file that shows you didn't qualify for disability, or new evidence clearly refutes prior evidence that you were disabled).

In these cases (called Group I Exceptions), the examiner does not need to find medical improvement in your case. However, the examiner still must find that you are not currently disabled to deny you benefits; that is, that you are capable of performing substantial gainful activity."

link quoted directly above:
http://www.disabilitysecrets.com/dne...ss-social.html

link to forum about Consultative Exams:
http://ssdfacts.com/forum/index.php?board=13.0

link about 5 step process:
http://www.ssa.gov/dibplan/dqualify5.htm

Hello everyone im new to this site I have been on disability since 1996 in 2010 I received a disability update report I fill it out and I received a letter a month later telling me that they didn't have to contact my doctor at this time and my next review is 7+ yrs which would be 2017 im trying to understand the coding they use on a disability update report does anyone know on the front of the scanner on disability update report if it say L/0048 is that consider low and I don't know what profiling score of 0048 meaning does it mean not expected to improve I just hate these reviews it bad enough that people on SSDI are sick and not feeling will we have to stress about the medical reviews if anyone can help me with the the code thank you and im glad to be here as a new member

How come no one can help me I posted a question about a week ago im new to this site and I don't know where to post so people can see it to reply HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!