Had I understood this was all for your amusement, I certainly wouldn't have wasted my time.

Your post from 1-17-2013
"If you get a chance, google NY Times January 11,2013 article on possible lawsuit settlement against bias aljs, because I think this has changed the landscape on being a mean judge who rules with a iron fist and rules not on facts right in front of him, but decides because he personally does not like or believe that person. Finally the little guy has a forum, it may take some time, a lawsuit, but now we have more than just Appeals Council to check their own people, plus Congress is wondering how one judge can approve 75 per cent versus the other guys 40 per cent. You better have your i"s dotted and T"s crossed."
*

And what was the outcome of the Queens Case? The settlement was those cases were remanded. That's it.

Seems this thread is creating some tension, and going off topic..

Please report any problematic posts.

bumping up to get back on topic of this thread... thank you