advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2015, 08:35 PM #21
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

I'm not going to continue to try to convince you of something you seem to not be open to, so best of luck to you.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote

advertisement
Old 08-30-2015, 08:41 PM #22
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
Default

Lit Love wrote:


Read this: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycloped...-disorder.html

^^^Thank you for the link. I read it. I also read a link from off of it. No where could I find info about seeing a therapist weekly.

Your Relationship With Your Doctor
Social Security gives more weight to the opinion of a doctor who has treated you regularly for a long period of time, called a treating physician or doctor. You must show that you have an “ongoing treatment relationship” with a doctor for Social Security to consider that person to be your treating physician. An ongoing treatment relationship means that you have seen the doctor with a frequency that is consistent with the accepted practice for patients with your condition. For example, if you only see your neurologist twice a year for treatment of your MS, Social Security will still consider them to be your treating physician if it is common for patients with MS to be seen by a neurologist twice a year.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encycloped...lity-file.html

Is it preferable to be at Step 5, rather than be denied at an earlier step? Sure, but Step 5 is by far the most complicated Step. SS routinely determines claimants can not perform prior work, but can perform other work. If you read the link I provided, it will explain some of it. Here it is again: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/oidap/...Evaluation.pdf

^^^For some reason the link above did not work for me. Thanks.
canifindagooddr is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:44 PM #23
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/oidap/...Evaluation.pdf
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
canifindagooddr (08-30-2015)
Old 08-30-2015, 08:50 PM #24
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
LIT LOVE LIT LOVE is offline
Magnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,304
10 yr Member
Default

"An ongoing treatment relationship means that you have seen the doctor with a frequency that is consistent with the accepted practice for patients with your condition."

I suggest you ask your attorney his opinion on if you need to see a therapist, and if so, how often.

I'd really rather not comment further.

Again, good luck.
LIT LOVE is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
canifindagooddr (08-30-2015)
Old 08-30-2015, 08:50 PM #25
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
Wow. 45 pages?! And lots of acronyms . . . Thanks but no thanks. I will choose to be dumb and in the dark. I have to do some fun things everyday or I will go crazy. Let me guess. I know. The SSA could care less if I go crazy and end up in a hospital . . .

I have a NOLO SSDI book. It described the five step sequential process in three pages. That was WAAAYYYYY cool!!!
canifindagooddr is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:01 PM #26
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIT LOVE View Post
I'm not going to continue to try to convince you of something you seem to not be open to, so best of luck to you.
Understood. What I gather is that I am on 5th base and that lots of people get stuck on 5th base. Correct?

To get off 5th base - one has to have medical evidence/records that they cannot do 'meaningful gainful whatever' it is called work of ANY KIND. Correct?

This means that they are so disabled that they can't even sit at a monitor or work a toll both or tell the gender of a chicken. They are in bad, bad shape.
Correct?

And, you think I am NOT in bad, bad shape. Therefore, I should quit my 'belly-aching' and get a job. Correct?

That that is your opinion and I got the gist of this too long thread. Correct?

Again, thank you for your concern and all the information you have shared. It has not been in vain as you seem to think it has. I have a document saved in Word called, "Lit Love" and many of the points that you have wisely brought up, I will discuss with my SSA attorney.

Thank you and God bless.
canifindagooddr is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:12 PM #27
Hopeless Hopeless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
10 yr Member
Hopeless Hopeless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
10 yr Member
Default

Did I miss something? How do you know you made it to Step 5? How do you know you were not at Step 2 when you hit the roadblock?

I guess I am in too much pain tonight to concentrate properly.


Quote:
Originally Posted by canifindagooddr View Post

^^^^Doesn't the fact that I made it to step 5 mean something? I have 'significant impairments' don't I? Wasn't that determined by the SSA since I got to step 5? And since THEY said I can no longer do my former job -- that would infer that they think all is not well in the Land of Oz. Nothing personal, and I do appreciate your knowledge and your frankness -- but frankly, you make it sound as if nothing is 'wrong' with me. It appears to me that the SSA think otherwise. And, when they finally get some good records to look at regarding my SFN, that might get me past step 5. Your thoughts? Thanks.
Hopeless is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:20 PM #28
Hopeless Hopeless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
10 yr Member
Hopeless Hopeless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
10 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canifindagooddr View Post
SSA has already called my impairments 'significant' right? They have already said, "You can not do your old line of work" . . . or something to that effect. . . Right? There are five bases to go around . . . I made it to fifth base on the first try. That seems like a good start. . . . But let me guess . . . EVERYBODY makes it to FIFTH BASE . . . and they stay stuck there . . . and therefore . . . never get benefits . . . and that is what is eventually going to happen to me. Correct? Once I am on fifth base - can they change their mind during the process and throw me back to third base? Thanks for sharing your knowledge with me.

How do you know you made it to 5th base as you say?

I feel like I was reading a book and skipped a few chapters.
Hopeless is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:21 PM #29
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeless View Post
How do you know you made it to 5th base as you say?

I feel like I was reading a book and skipped a few chapters.
Post 11 of this thread. Lit's concluding paragraph gave me this good news:

SS then would have ruled out that you qualified via the GRID Rules even though you are over the age of 50. When going through the 5 Step Sequential Process, they determined you could no longer perform your prior work (step 4) but could perform other work (step 5).
canifindagooddr is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:25 PM #30
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
canifindagooddr canifindagooddr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 132
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeless View Post
Did I miss something? How do you know you made it to Step 5? How do you know you were not at Step 2 when you hit the roadblock?

I guess I am in too much pain tonight to concentrate properly.
Understood on the pain - I thought I had one more Gaba to take . . . Very disappointed when I found out that was not the case . . .

Lit told me I was on step 5 at the bottom of her post - #11:


SS then would have ruled out that you qualified via the GRID Rules even though you are over the age of 50. When going through the 5 Step Sequential Process, they determined you could no longer perform your prior work (step 4) but could perform other work (step 5).
canifindagooddr is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.