advertisement
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2017, 10:58 AM #1
davOD davOD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: AZ.
Posts: 377
8 yr Member
davOD davOD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: AZ.
Posts: 377
8 yr Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janke View Post
Her CDB (formerly called DAC) would end unless, like a previous poster said, she is in a protected marriage to another CDB, but not to an SSI recipient.

There is an assumption in SSA law that marriage conveys a responsibility for the other person. That is why spouses can get benefits from the deceased or retired husband/wife. So when she marries, the responsibility for her shifts from her parents to her spouse. And she is no longer a dependent of her parents. She then has the potential to be eligible on the spouse's record if she meets age (62) requirements.

She will have to decide if keeping the CDB benefits is more or less important than marriage. It is a choice.
That is a great explanation, Thank You!
davOD is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 03-11-2017, 01:47 PM #2
DBaron DBaron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 11
5 yr Member
DBaron DBaron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 11
5 yr Member
Default

Usually, Social Security takes away benefits for a disabled person with a claim on a parent's work record as soon as they marry. The big exception is if they marry another disabled adult who is claiming benefits from a parent's work record.

That's because spouses have a legal duty to support one another.

What happens in reality of course is that it makes it impossible for people to get married because they would be financially sunk once the disabled person has ZERO income, still can't work, and becomes a financial drag on the marriage.

I'm quite certain that there are lots of people out there who avoid getting married and cohabitate because the government does stuff like this to people.

Oh, and if Social Security finds out that you're cohabitating with a person who you are intimate with and "could get married", they can treat you like you did get married and take benefits away even if you aren't married.

So, the way I see it, it's heads they win, tails you lose.

But it's probably hard to prove that such a situation exists. I've heard of senior citizens who are in a similar predicament (benefits from a deceased spouse) who cohabitate.

I'm not going to say it's the right or wrong thing to do, but these are Social Security's policies and what people in the real world are doing because of it.

Social Security, in many cases, is the classic example of a poverty trap.
DBaron is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Tags
benefits, disabled, fathers, marrys, parents


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about benefits from husband on Disability MelodyL Social Security Disability 11 12-17-2013 10:42 PM
Question about Social Security benefits?? MelodyL Social Chat 12 10-13-2008 10:32 AM
SSDI Since 2006 My Child Gets No Benefits blossom58 Social Security Disability 6 10-01-2008 09:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.