The Stumble Inn The place for social chat for our M.S. community. The Stumble Inn


advertisement
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-25-2008, 07:24 PM #1
Bearygood Bearygood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 970
15 yr Member
Bearygood Bearygood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 970
15 yr Member
Default Stats Get Me Down

We often talk aobut MS in the media and that inaccurate portrayals aside, raising awareness is a positive and necessary thing. However, one of my biggest beefs in regard to raising awareness are the "approximately 400,000 people in the US" and "2.5 million people worldwide" have MS quotes. We see these numbers in every article, obviously culled from their appearance on the NMSS website. Without being statisticians, everyone here knows there's a whole lot more people who have MS.

Today in the mail I got an invitation to an MS fundraising dinner in CA. The cover letter cited the 2.5 million people worldwide statistic and on an accompanying letter (on the local society's letterhead), it said the goal of the fundraiser was to raise money for the "101,500 touched by MS in the Southern California chapter area".

So, I got bummed out about this issue all over again today. Obviously, 25% of the entire U.S. MS population doesn't live in the LA area and it just reminded me once more about the flawed statistics.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the last time some sort of census was taken was 1979. I've read that a new census is in the works although I don't know when it's expected to appear. But in the meantime how hard would it be to collect data from the local chapters? Obviously, by virtue of the letter I got, it doesn't look like it would be that hard to get at least a BETTER number in the interim.

It just makes me feel like by these numbers remaining static, it somewhat inherently contradicts efforts to raise awareness. As the number increases for ANY disease, so will the attention.
Okay, getting off now.

I really got bummed out by this and was just wondering if anyone else is as bothered as I am.
Bearygood is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
"Thanks for this!" says:
dmplaura (08-25-2008), Jules A (08-25-2008), weegot5kiz (08-25-2008), who moi (08-26-2008), yeahbut (09-01-2008)
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need stats on avg clinical trial costs boann Parkinson's Disease 6 10-24-2006 09:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin • Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.7.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

NeuroTalk Forums

Helping support those with neurological and related conditions.

 

The material on this site is for informational purposes only,
and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment
provided by a qualified health care provider.


Always consult your doctor before trying anything you read here.