I'd like to send people to our about - both to see who we are that run it, and also our advisory board.

The reality is that the manpower we have is finite, and to do proper research takes time. It took us 6 months to fully do Vitamin D, and Vitamin C has been in-progress for a very long time.

We have a master list of supplements to hit, and we are slowly but surely chipping away at them. There are tons of supplements - in the past week we just finished MSM (popular for joints), krill oil, and chia seeds.

In regards to the scientific mumbo jumbo - I agree It can be overwhelming, and one of our big revamps this month is to our Human Trials Database. Instead of focusing on statistical significance, we have changed the focus on clinical significance. This will make it far easier to see what supplements have what effects. A preview for caffeine: **

We've also been expanding our meta-data on each study - we now include trial length, body type, and gender. In regards to funding, when the funding is suspect, we do note it (eg all of the pro-CLA research was funded by Kraft, the largest supplier for CLA).

Hope that clears away any concerns people have. We take what we've been building (for over two years) *very* seriously. If you want to know more, we were recently interviewed by SNI: ** (SNI is operated by ISSN, which has their own peer-review journal).

[I had to break up the URLs as I am a newbie poster]