I have reviewed my regimen of 1982 with current doctors and it has been well received. I have modified it in the past 30 years. Vit D3 was not a part of it nor was Fish Oil.

I am not dissing examine.com. I just suggest that it has a lack of information that is widely available in other online sources. It also has a tendency to repeat what I would call 'mainstream misinformation.'

I don't think NT is the place to promote or discuss examine.com in its current state. Just my opinion.

I am surprised that Sol came onto NT so fast to defend the site.

To be specific, the diet soda comments are incomplete and inaccurate. The HFCS also sounds like it is right from the Archer Daniels Midland propaganda. Why is there even a comment on Cannabis if so little is going to be said? It does not even differentiate between THC and Canabinoid. It does not require rocket science to understand the THC is the hallucinogenic compound and Canabinoid has shown to have the health values. Again, incomplete information.

An informational web site should be able to start with basic undisputed information and add to it as further information becomes known. There are a number of concussion web sites that are just as incomplete and misleading.

They state directly that examine.com is about fitness nutrition. The goals of fitness nutrition are quite different than PCS/brain nutrition.

btw, I have not looked at the FB side of examine.com.