pinka,

I missed your question about NUCCA and chiro neuro. Chiro neuro is often related to the work of Dr Carrick of the Carrick Institute. It has no comparison to NUCCA which is very similar to Atlas Orthagonal Chiro. They treat subtle subluxations of C-1 and C-2. Some NUCCA believe that all that needs to be treated in C-1 and C-2. The rest of the spine and body will respond to good C-1 and C-2. Other NUCCA chiros also treat the rest of the spine.

NUCCA is often covered under chiro if you have chiro coverage but the expensive x-ray series is not covered.

Chiro neuro has many parts of the protocol that would not be covered by insurance, even with good chiro coverage.

I don't have a recommendation of either. There are too many variables between doctors and patients. For some, they work great. For others, it is a waste of money.

Thank you Mark for detail information. I will investigate these two options and opt for one of these.

I suggest you check out what is available so you can call to ask how they handle symptoms like you have. It might be that neither is appropriate for your needs. I don't think there is a need to make it an either or choice.

the looking normal part of brain injury is one of the worst part. Even though I had to many symptoms and suffer a lot the only test that showed any brain damage was an eyes test and I ended up getting disability for depression and not brain injury believe it or not. I guess I was lucky that the brain injury caused such depressing lol